Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850355›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones in children <5 years of age.

Vaddi Chandramohan, P M Siddalingaswamy, Paidakula Ramakrishna, Ganesan Soundarya, Babu Manas, Anandan Hemnath

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Erratum: Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones in children <5 years of age.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vaddi ChandramohanDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
P M SiddalingaswamyDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Paidakula RamakrishnaDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ganesan SoundaryaDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Babu ManasDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Anandan HemnathDepartment of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Hyderabad Rheumatology Center · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are very few studies in the literature describing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in preschool children. We have evaluated the feasibility, stone-free rate, and complications of RIRS in children <5 years of age.

methodsAll children <5 years of age and stone size <2 cm (renal/proximal ureteric), who underwent RIRS at our hospital from February 2010 to May 2020 were included in this retrospective study. All children were prestented for the passive dilatation of ureter. A 7.5 Fr flexible ureterorenoscope was introduced over the ureteral access sheath (UAS) or over a guidewire. At 2 weeks, the stent was removed and at 2 months the child was evaluated for residual stones.

resultsA total of 62 children with 67 renal units met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 42.11 months (4-60 months). Mean weight was 13.31 kg (6-16.3 kg). Mean stone size was 11.9 mm (7.3-18.2 mm). Majority of the stones were in pelvis (37.8%). UAS 9.5/11.5 Fr was placed in 40 (63.5%) children. Mean operative time was 55.2 min; mean hospitalization was 61 h. Four out of the 67 renal units (5.9%) required conversion to minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the same sitting, due to access failure. Two cases who developed post-operative fever required a change of antibiotics. Two cases required ureteroscopy for steinstrasse postoperatively. Stone-free rate at 2 months for stones size ≤2 mm was 76.3%.

conclusionPediatric RIRS is a promising option in young children as it offers acceptable stone-free rates and a low incidence of high-grade complications. However, it requires expertise and should be offered in tertiary care centres.

Identifiers

PMID33850355
PMCPMC8033242
OpenAlexW3120858822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.