ArticleScientific reports2021
In vitro evaluation of simulated stereotactic radiotherapy for wet age-related macular degeneration on three different cell lines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological drug screening to inhibit uveal melanoma metastatic cells eitherInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low energy stereotactic radiotherapy has been proposed for the treatment of neovascular age related macular degeneration. We investigated the in vitro effect of the radiotherapy on pericytes, retinal pigment epithelium and endothelial cells. Primary human retinal pigment epithelium cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells and human pericytes from Placenta were cultivated. In a pairwise protocol, one plate was irradiated at a dose of 16 Gy, while the second plate served as a non-irradiated control. Thereafter, cells were cultivated either in serum-free (non-permissive) or serum-stimulated (permissive) conditions. A life/dead assay, an XTT and a BrdU assay were performed up to 7 days after irradiation. No cell death occurred at any timepoint in any cell line after treatment nor in the control. Compared to the unirradiated controls, cell viability and metabolic activity were significantly reduced in irradiated cells in the XTT assay, except for non-permissive RPE cells. In the BrdU assay, proliferation was inhibited. While no cell death was detected in vitro, viability and proliferative capacity of all cell lines were significantly reduced. Therefore, it seems that low energy stereotactic radiotherapy inhibits angiogenesis without a direct induction of apoptosis but influencing microvascular function and stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.