ArticleScientific reports2021
Interaction of surface pattern and contour shape in the tilt after effects evoked by symmetry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Figure-ground responsive fields of monkey V4 neurons estimated from natural image patches.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integration of multiple properties of an object is a fundamental function of the visual cortex in object recognition. For instance, surface patterns and contour shapes are thought to be crucial characteristics that jointly contribute to recognition. However, the mechanisms of integration and corresponding cortical representations have not been fully clarified. We investigated the integration of surfaces and shapes by examining the tilt after effects (TAEs) evoked by the symmetry of patterns and contours. As symmetry in both pattern and contour evokes TAEs, we can directly measure the interaction between the two. The measured TAEs exhibited mutual transfer between the symmetry of the pattern (SP) and that of the contour shape (SS), i.e., adaptation by SP (SS) evoked TAEs when tested by SS (SP), suggesting the existence of an integrated representation. Next, we examined the interaction between SP and SS when both were simultaneously presented in adaptation. Congruent adaptors wherein their symmetry axes aligned evoked compressive interaction, whereas incongruent adaptors wherein the axes of SP and SS tilted to the opposite directions evoked subtractive interaction. These results suggest the existence of a cortical representation that integrates the properties of the surface and shape with suppressive interactions, which can provide crucial insights into the formation of object representation as well as the integration of visual information in the cortex.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.