Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850214›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

The whole is greater than its parts: ensembling improves protein contact prediction.

Wendy M Billings, Connor J Morris, Dennis Della Corte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wendy M BillingsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7281-161X
Connor J MorrisDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0754-0670
Dennis Della CorteDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA. Dennis.DellaCorte@byu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8884-9724

Funding

Predictive Structure-based Guidelines for Identifying Optimal PEGylation Sites within Proteins and Understanding the Context-Dependence of Non-covalent Interaction StrengthR15GM116055 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY · PI PRICE, JOSHUA L · 2015 to 2020
$781k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM116055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prediction of amino acid contacts from protein sequence is an important problem, as protein contacts are a vital step towards the prediction of folded protein structures. We propose that a powerful concept from deep learning, called ensembling, can increase the accuracy of protein contact predictions by combining the outputs of different neural network models. We show that ensembling the predictions made by different groups at the recent Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP13) outperforms all individual groups. Further, we show that contacts derived from the distance predictions of three additional deep neural networks-AlphaFold, trRosetta, and ProSPr-can be substantially improved by ensembling all three networks. We also show that ensembling these recent deep neural networks with the best CASP13 group creates a superior contact prediction tool. Finally, we demonstrate that two ensembled networks can successfully differentiate between the folds of two highly homologous sequences. In order to build further on these findings, we propose the creation of a better protein contact benchmark set and additional open-source contact prediction methods.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteinsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDeep LearningModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein FoldingSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID33850214
PMCPMC8044223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.