Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850173›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A graph neural network framework for causal inference in brain networks.

S Wein, W M Malloni, A M Tomé, S M Frank, G -I Henze, S Wüst, M W Greenlee, E W Lang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Causal graph neural networks for healthcare.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. PredictingFrontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S WeinCIML, Biophysics, University of Regensburg, 93040, Regensburg, Germany. Simon.Wein@ur.de.
W M MalloniExperimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.
A M ToméIEETA/DETI, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
S M FrankDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic,and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.
G -I HenzeExperimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.
S WüstExperimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.
M W GreenleeExperimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.
E W LangCIML, Biophysics, University of Regensburg, 93040, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in neuroscience is how self-organizing dynamic interactions in the brain emerge on their relatively static structural backbone. Due to the complexity of spatial and temporal dependencies between different brain areas, fully comprehending the interplay between structure and function is still challenging and an area of intense research. In this paper we present a graph neural network (GNN) framework, to describe functional interactions based on the structural anatomical layout. A GNN allows us to process graph-structured spatio-temporal signals, providing a possibility to combine structural information derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with temporal neural activity profiles, like that observed in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Moreover, dynamic interactions between different brain regions discovered by this data-driven approach can provide a multi-modal measure of causal connectivity strength. We assess the proposed model's accuracy by evaluating its capabilities to replicate empirically observed neural activation profiles, and compare the performance to those of a vector auto regression (VAR), like that typically used in Granger causality. We show that GNNs are able to capture long-term dependencies in data and also computationally scale up to the analysis of large-scale networks. Finally we confirm that features learned by a GNN can generalize across MRI scanner types and acquisition protocols, by demonstrating that the performance on small datasets can be improved by pre-training the GNN on data from an earlier study. We conclude that the proposed multi-modal GNN framework can provide a novel perspective on the structure-function relationship in the brain. Accordingly this approach appears to be promising for the characterization of the information flow in brain networks.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBrain MappingDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID33850173
PMCPMC8044149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.