Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850132›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Tissue-specific cell-free DNA degradation quantifies circulating tumor DNA burden.

Guanhua Zhu, Yu A Guo, Danliang Ho, Polly Poon, Zhong Wee Poh, Pui Mun Wong, Anna Gan, Mei Mei Chang, Dimitrios Kleftogiannis, Yi Ting Lau and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Guanhua ZhuGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Yu A GuoGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3478-7991
Danliang HoGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Polly PoonGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Zhong Wee PohGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Pui Mun WongGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Anna GanGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Mei Mei ChangGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Dimitrios KleftogiannisGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Yi Ting LauGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore.
Brenda TayNational Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Wan Jun LimNational Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Clarinda ChuaNational Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tira J TanNational Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Si-Lin KooNational Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Dawn Q ChongNational Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yoon Sim YapNational Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-5066
Iain TanGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore. tanbhi@gis.a-star.edu.sg.
Sarah NgGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore. ngbhs@gis.a-star.edu.sg.
Anders J SkanderupGenome Institute of Singapore (GIS), A*STAR, Singapore, Singapore. skanderupamj@gis.a-star.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0001-6847-4980
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may offer a non-invasive approach to monitor disease progression. Here, we develop a quantitative method, exploiting local tissue-specific cell-free DNA (cfDNA) degradation patterns, that accurately estimates ctDNA burden independent of genomic aberrations. Nucleosome-dependent cfDNA degradation at promoters and first exon-intron junctions is strongly associated with differential transcriptional activity in tumors and blood. A quantitative model, based on just 6 regulatory regions, could accurately predict ctDNA levels in colorectal cancer patients. Strikingly, a model restricted to blood-specific regulatory regions could predict ctDNA levels across both colorectal and breast cancer patients. Using compact targeted sequencing (<25 kb) of predictive regions, we demonstrate how the approach could enable quantitative low-cost tracking of ctDNA dynamics and disease progression.

Indexed as

DNA FragmentationCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNAColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansMutationTumor BurdenCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID33850132
PMCPMC8044092
OpenAlexW3155801082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.