Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850100›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2021

Preliminary examination of Coaching in Context with clients with spinal cord injury.

Caitlin Cadematori, Bernadette Alpajora, Taylor Sivori, Samantha Betz, Nicole Gerhardt, Winnie Dunn, M J Mulcahey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07083713 (Group Coaching for Life Goals in People With Neurological Conditions), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07083713 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Group Coaching for Life Goals in People With Neurological Conditions: A Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas Jefferson UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsStudents, Spinal Cord Injury, Ehlers Danlos Syndrome, Care GiversArmsGroup Coaching
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin CadematoriCenter for Outcomes and Measurement, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bernadette AlpajoraCenter for Outcomes and Measurement, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Taylor SivoriCenter for Outcomes and Measurement, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Samantha BetzCenter for Outcomes and Measurement, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicole GerhardtCenter for Outcomes and Measurement, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Winnie DunnUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
M J MulcaheyCenter for Outcomes and Measurement, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Maryjane.mulcahey@jefferson.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0837-714X
Thomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRepeated measures pilot study.

objectivesThis study examined Coaching in Context when introduced to community-dwelling adults with spinal cord injury (SCI).

settingUrban community.

methodsThree volunteers participated in up to ten, 45-60-min Coaching in Context sessions. Number of coaching sessions was recorded. Usefulness of Coaching in Context was examined by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS), and the Moorong Self-efficacy Scale (MSES). Data were examined descriptively.

resultsPreliminary examination of Coaching in Context revealed successful implementation with adults with SCI living in the community. Mean COPM performance and satisfaction scores increased by 2.55 (SD = 2.25) and 4.27 (SD = 2.41), respectively. With the exception of one, each goal achieved or exceeded GAS expected level. Changed MSES scores ranged from +7 to +16.

conclusionsThe ability to implement and evaluate Coaching in Context with three adults with SCI was demonstrated. Improvement in goals established for coaching was also documented.

Indexed as

MentoringSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultCanadaHumansPilot ProjectsSelf Efficacy

Identifiers

PMID33850100
PMCPMC8042629
OpenAlexW3155866028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.