Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850039›Full record

ArticlemSystems2021

Free-Living, Psychrotrophic Bacteria of the Genus

Daphne K Welter, Albane Ruaud, Zachariah M Henseler, Hannah N De Jong, Peter van Coeverden de Groot, Johan Michaux, Linda Gormezano, Jillian L Waters, Nicholas D Youngblut, Ruth E Ley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. First genome sequence and functional profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daphne K WelterDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Albane RuaudDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Zachariah M HenselerDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Hannah N De JongDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter van Coeverden de GrootDepartment of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Johan MichauxConservation Genetics Laboratory, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Linda GormezanoDepartment of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA.
Jillian L WatersDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.
Nicholas D YoungblutDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7424-5276
Ruth E LeyDepartment of Microbiome Science, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany rley@tuebingen.mpg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-1672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host-adapted microorganisms are generally assumed to have evolved from free-living, environmental microorganisms, as examples of the reverse process are rare. In the phylum

Indexed as

genomicsphylogenyPsychrobacterpsychrophiles

Identifiers

PMID33850039
PMCPMC8546975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.