Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33850001›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2021

Heterogeneous distribution of tau pathology in the behavioural variant of Alzheimer's disease.

Ellen Singleton, Oskar Hansson, Yolande A L Pijnenburg, Renaud La Joie, William G Mantyh, Pontus Tideman, Erik Stomrud, Antoine Leuzy, Maurits Johansson, Olof Strandberg and 19 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Celebrating neuropathology's contributions to Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Tauopathies: new perspectives and challenges.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Recent update on the heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease spectrum.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Ellen SingletonAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands e.singleton@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6034-8688
Oskar HanssonClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Yolande A L PijnenburgAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Renaud La JoieMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2581-8100
William G MantyhMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Pontus TidemanClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Erik StomrudClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Antoine LeuzyClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Maurits JohanssonClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Olof StrandbergClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ruben SmithClinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Evi BerendrechtAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Bruce L MillerMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Leonardo IaccarinoMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lauren EdwardsMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Amelia StromMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Emma E WoltersDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Emma CoomansDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Denise VisserDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sandeep S V GollaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hayel TuncelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Femke BouwmanAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
John Cornelis Van SwietenDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6278-6844
Janne M PapmaDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Bart van BerckelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Philip ScheltensAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anke A DijkstraDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2464-1905
Gil D RabinoviciMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Rik OssenkoppeleAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1584-7477
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLLund University · SEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USErasmus MC · NLVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

TDP-43 Loss-of-Function: Biology to BiomarkersP01AG019724 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jennifer Merrilees · 2002 to 2026
$67.2M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Serggio Carlo Lanata · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
Early Age-of-Onset AD: Clinical Heterogeneity and Network DegenerationR01AG045611 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RABINOVICI, GIL DAN · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019724NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062422NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe clinical phenotype of the rare behavioural variant of Alzheimer's disease (bvAD) is insufficiently understood. Given the strong clinico-anatomical correlations of tau pathology in AD, we investigated the distribution of tau deposits in bvAD, in-vivo and ex-vivo, using positron emission tomography (PET) and postmortem examination.

methodsFor the tau PET study, seven amyloid-β positive bvAD patients underwent [

resultsIndividual regional W-scores ≥1.96 (corresponding to p<0.05) were observed in three cases, that is, case #5: medial prefrontal cortex (W=2.13) and anterior default mode network (W=3.79), case #2: lateral prefrontal cortex (W=2.79) and salience network (W=2.77), and case #7: frontal-to-entorhinal ratio (W=2.04). The remaining four cases fell within the normal distributions of the tAD group. Postmortem AT8 staining indicated no group-level regional differences in phosphorylated tau levels between bvAD and tAD (all p>0.05).

conclusionsBoth in-vivo and ex-vivo, patients with bvAD showed heterogeneous distributions of tau pathology. Since key regions involved in behavioural regulation were not consistently disproportionally affected by tau pathology, other factors are more likely driving the clinical phenotype in bvAD.

Identifiers

PMID33850001
PMCPMC8292599
OpenAlexW3154642394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.