Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849977›Full record

ReviewmBio2021

Reframing Nutritional Microbiota Studies To Reflect an Inherent Metabolic Flexibility of the Human Gut: a Narrative Review Focusing on High-Fat Diets.

Jonathan Sholl, Lucy J Mailing, Thomas R Wood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan Sholl *Université Bordeaux, CNRS, ImmunoConcEpT, UMR 5164, Bordeaux, France jonathan.sholl@u-bordeaux.fr tommyrw@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3786-2061
Lucy J Mailing *Independent Researcher, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Thomas R WoodInstitute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensacola, Florida, USA jonathan.sholl@u-bordeaux.fr tommyrw@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1130-2720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a broad consensus in nutritional-microbiota research that high-fat (HF) diets are harmful to human health, at least in part through their modulation of the gut microbiota. However, various studies also support the inherent flexibility of the human gut and our microbiota's ability to adapt to a variety of food sources, suggesting a more nuanced picture. In this article, we first discuss some problems facing basic translational research and provide a different framework for thinking about diet and gut health in terms of metabolic flexibility. We then offer evidence that well-formulated HF diets, such as ketogenic diets, may provide healthful alternative fuel sources for the human gut. We place this in the context of cancer research, where this concern over HF diets is also expressed, and consider various potential objections concerning the effects of lipopolysaccharides, trimethylamine-

Indexed as

Diet, High-FatMicrobiotaNutrition AssessmentAnimalsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMiceNarrationObesitycancergut healthhigh-fat dietsmetabolic flexibilitymicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID33849977
PMCPMC8092254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.