Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849942›Full record

Trial reportGut2022

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of PPI-dependent GERD: results from a randomised, sham controlled trial.

Rakesh Kalapala, Arun Karyampudi, Zaheer Nabi, Santosh Darisetty, Nitin Jagtap, Mohan Ramchandani, Rajesh Gupta, Sundeep Lakhtakia, Rajesh Goud, G Venkat Rao and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03322553 (Endoscopic Full Thickness Plication), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03322553 nacompletednot on this map

Endoscopic Full Thickness Plication (GERD-X) for the Treatment of PPI Dependent GERD: Randomized, Double Blinded, Sham Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled70ConditionsGastro Esophageal Reflux DiseaseArmsGERD-X
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of anti-reflux mucosal ablation therapy at 12 months.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Efficacy and Safety of Closure-Focused Anti-Reflux Mucoplasty Compared With Conventional ARMS: A Propensity Score-Matched Study (With Video).Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the diagnosis and management of GERD: methodology and review of evidence.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rakesh KalapalaMedical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India drkalpala@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3203-7708
Arun KaryampudiMedical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Zaheer NabiMedical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Santosh DarisettyAnaesthesia, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Nitin JagtapMedical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3469-0164
Mohan RamchandaniGastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenetrology, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Rajesh GuptaAsian Institute of Gatroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Sundeep LakhtakiaGastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenetrology, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Rajesh GoudAsian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
G Venkat RaoSurgical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.
Prateek SharmaUniversity of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
D Nageshwar ReddyAsian Healthcare Foundation, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology · INUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of endoscopic antireflux procedures for GERD are cumbersome to use and randomised long-term data are sparse. We conducted such a trial to determine the efficacy and safety of a novel, easy to use endoscopic full-thickness fundoplication (EFTP) device in patients with GERD.

designPatients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent GERD were randomised to either EFTP or a sham procedure in 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was ≥50% improvement in the health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score at 3 months. Secondary end points included improvement in GERD-HRQL, reflux symptom scores, PPI usage, oesophageal acid exposure and reflux episodes and endoscopic findings at 3, 6 and 12 months.

resultsSeventy patients were randomised; 35 in each group with a median (IQR) age of 36 (29-42) years, 71.4% males. 70% had non-erosive reflux disease on endoscopy with a mean DeMeester score of 18.9 (±19.93). The mean (±SD) duration of EFTP procedure was 17.4 (±4) min. The primary end point was more frequently achieved in the EFTP group (65.7% vs 2.9%; p<0.001). Median (IQR) % improvement in GERD-HRQL was significantly higher in the EFTP group at 6 (81.4 (60.9-100.0) versus 8.0 (2.2-21.6); p<0.001) and 12 (92.3 (84.4-100.0) versus 9.1 (4.8-36.0); p<0.001) months. In the EFTP group, 62.8% patients were off-PPI at 12 months compared with 11.4% in the sham group (p<0.001). pH-metry parameters partially improved at 3 months, (n=70; total reflux episodes in EFTP arm and non-acid reflux episodes for EFTP vs sham) but not at 12 months (n=27); endoscopic oesophagitis was seen in 0% in the treatment (n=18) and 5 (29.4%) in the control group (n=17) at 12 months. No major procedure-related adverse events were encountered in either group.

conclusionEFTP using a novel device is safe and effective in improving quality of life in patients with PPI dependent mostly non-erosive reflux disease at short and long terms; objective parameters showed a limited response rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03322553.

Indexed as

Esophagitis, PepticGastroesophageal RefluxAdultEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleHumansMaleProton Pump InhibitorsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeProton Pump Inhibitorsendoscopygastroesophageal reflux diseasequality of life

Identifiers

PMID33849942
PMCPMC8921577
OpenAlexW3153141153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.