ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2023
Voice Feature Selection to Improve Performance of Machine Learning Models for Voice Production Inversion.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subject-Specific Modeling by Domain Adaptation for the Estimation of Subglottal Pressure from Neck-Surface Acceleration Signals.Biomedical signal processing and control · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Neuromuscular Control of Vocal Source for Voice Production.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Estimating subglottal pressure and vocal fold adduction from the produced voice in a single-subject study (L).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEstimation of physiological control parameters of the vocal system from the produced voice outcome has important applications in clinical management of voice disorders . Previously we developed a simulation-based neural network for estimation of vocal fold geometry, mechanical properties, and subglottal pressure from voice outcome features that characterize the acoustics of the produced voice. The goals of this study are to (1) explore the possibility of improving the estimation accuracy of physiological control parameters by including voice outcome features characterizing vocal fold vibration; and (2) identify voice feature sets that optimize both estimation accuracy and robustness to measurement noise.
methodsFeedforward neural networks are trained to solve the inversion problem of estimating the physiological control parameters of a three-dimensional body-cover vocal fold model from different sets of voice outcome features that characterize the simulated voice acoustics, glottal flow, and vocal fold vibration. A sensitivity analysis is then performed to evaluate the contribution of individual voice features to the overall performance of the neural networks in estimating the physiologic control parameters. RESULTS AND
conclusionsWhile including voice outcome features characterizing vocal fold vibration increases estimation accuracy, it also reduces the network's robustness to measurement noise, due to high sensitivity of network performance to voice outcome features measuring the absolute amplitudes of the glottal flow and area waveforms, which are also difficult to measure accurately in practical applications. By excluding such glottal flow-based features and replacing glottal area-based features by their normalized counterparts, we are able to significantly improve both estimation accuracy and robustness to noise. We further show that similar estimation accuracy and robustness can be achieved with an even smaller set of voice outcome features by excluding features of small sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.