ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2021
Effect of prior treatments on selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma.
Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect modification in network meta-analyses for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel Versus Standard-of-Care Treatments for Patients with Previously Treated Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.Advances in therapy · 2025Trial
- Selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone in previously treated multiple myeloma: Outcomes by cytogenetic risk.American journal of hematology · 2021Trial
- Nuclear transport proteins: structure, function, and disease relevance.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Review
- Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone: A Review in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.Targeted oncology · 2023Review
- Recent Advances in the Applications of Small Molecules in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The molecular mechanism and challenge of targeting XPO1 in treatment of relapsed and refractory myeloma.Translational oncology · 2022Review
- Revisiting Proteasome Inhibitors: Molecular Underpinnings of Their Development, Mechanisms of Resistance and Strategies to Overcome Anti-Cancer Drug Resistance.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- MYC inhibitors in multiple myeloma.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic regimens for previously treated multiple myeloma (MM) may not provide prolonged disease control and are often complicated by significant adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy. In patients with previously treated MM in the Phase 3 BOSTON study, once weekly selinexor, once weekly bortezomib, and 40 mg dexamethasone (XVd) demonstrated a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS), higher response rates, deeper responses, a trend to improved survival, and reduced incidence and severity of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy when compared with standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg dexamethasone (Vd). The pre-specified analyses described here evaluated the influence of the number of prior lines of therapy, prior treatment with lenalidomide, prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) therapy, prior immunomodulatory drug therapy, and prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) on the efficacy and safety of XVd compared with Vd. In this 1:1 randomized study, enrolled patients were assigned to receive once weekly oral selinexor (100 mg) with once weekly subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.