Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849606›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2021

IOERT versus external beam electrons for boost radiotherapy in stage I/II breast cancer: 10-year results of a phase III randomized study.

Antonella Ciabattoni, Fabiana Gregucci, Gerd Fastner, Silvio Cavuto, Antonio Spera, Stefano Drago, Ingrid Ziegler, Maria Alessandra Mirri, Rita Consorti, Felix Sedlmayer

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The evolution of targeted intra operative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Intraoperative irradiation in breast cancer: preliminary results in 80 patients as partial breast irradiation or anticipated boost prior to hypo-fractionated whole breast irradiation.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonella CiabattoniDepartment of Radiotherapy, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Fabiana GregucciDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy. fabianagregucci@gmail.com.
Gerd FastnerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria.
Silvio CavutoInfrastructure Research and Statistics, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, AUSL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Antonio SperaDepartment of Radiotherapy, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, ASP Agrigento, Agrigento, Italy.
Stefano DragoDepartment of Breast and Reconstructive Surgery, Sando Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Ingrid ZieglerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria.
Maria Alessandra MirriDepartment of Radiotherapy, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Rita ConsortiMedical Physics Unit, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy.
Felix SedlmayerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATASL Roma · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITNuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio · ITOspedale Generale Regionale Francesco Miulli · ITOspedale Sandro Pertini · ITOspedale San Filippo Neri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) boost could be not inferior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost in terms of local control and tissue tolerance. The aim of the study is to present the long-term follow-up results on local control, esthetic evaluation, and toxicity of a prospective study on early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery with an IOERT boost of 10 Gy (experimental group) versus 5 × 2 Gy EBRT boost (standard arm). Both arms received whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with 50 Gy (2 Gy single dose).

methodsA single-institution phase III randomized study to compare IOERT versus EBRT boost in early-stage breast cancer was conducted as a non-inferiority trial. Primary endpoints were the evaluation of in-breast true recurrences (IBTR) and out-field local recurrences (LR) as well as toxicity and cosmetic results. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and patient's grade of satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes.

resultsBetween 1999 and 2004, 245 patients were randomized: 133 for IOERT and 112 for EBRT. The median follow-up was 12 years (range 10-16 years). The cumulative risk of IBTR at 5-10 years was 0.8% and 4.3% after IOERT, compared to 4.2% and 5.3% after EBRT boost (p = 0.709). The cumulative risk of out-field LR at 5-10 years was 4.7% and 7.9% for IOERT versus 5.2% and 10.3% for EBRT (p = 0.762). All of the IOERT arm recurrences were observed at > 100 months' follow-up, whereas the mean time to recurrence in the EBRT group was earlier (55.2 months) (p < 0.05). No late complications associated with IOERT were observed. The overall cosmetic results were scored as good or excellent in physician and patient evaluations for both IOERT and EBRT. There were significantly better scores for IOERT at all time points in physician and patient evaluations with the greatest difference at the end of EBRT (p = 0.006 objective and p = 0.0004 subjective) and most narrow difference at 12 months after the end of EBRT (p = 0.08 objective and p = 0.04 subjective analysis).

conclusionA 10-Gy IOERT boost during breast-conserving surgery provides high local control rates without significant morbidity. Although not significantly superior to external beam boosts, the median time to local recurrences after IOERT is prolonged by more than 4 years.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsElectronsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntraoperative PeriodMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy DosageSurvival AnalysisBreast cancerCosmesisElectronsIntraoperative radiotherapyLocal controlToxicityTumor bed boost

Identifiers

PMID33849606
PMCPMC8045244
OpenAlexW3153631069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.