Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849510›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2021

Applying visual mapping techniques to promote learning in community-based medical education activities.

Sonali G Choudhari, Abhay M Gaidhane, Priti Desai, Tripti Srivastava, Vedprakash Mishra, Syed Quazi Zahiruddin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonali G ChoudhariDepartment of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. sonalic27@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-5096
Abhay M GaidhaneDepartment of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Priti DesaiSchool of Health Professions Education & Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Tripti SrivastavaFaculty Development Committee, Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE), Maharashtra, Wardha, India.
Vedprakash MishraPro-Chancellor, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Maharashtra, Wardha, India.
Syed Quazi ZahiruddinDepartment of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeaching and learning Community-Based Medical Education (CBME) requires the active engagement of students in various activities to cover planned curricular content. CBME being multifaceted involves careful application and formation of links when attending to community health problems and public health issues. Students often depend on factual recall rather than 'engaging in', to counteract the broad and comprehensive nature of CBME. This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of Visual mapping techniques as a learning tool in a CBME program for the subject Community Medicine and thereby assist medical undergraduate students in overcoming identified learning challenges. METHODOLOGY: An interventional study was conducted where medical undergraduates were randomly assigned to two different groups (each group = 30). After sensitization, a broad theme was taught to both the groups as a part of community-based teaching (CBT), each week for a month. The students in the intervention group were given the assignment to draw visual maps using the mind mapping & concept mapping techniques, after each CBT session, while the control group had Question-Answer session with built-in discussion (Conventional method) by an equally qualified, experienced faculty with no mapping assignments. A surprise written examination was conducted on the topics taught, and scores of both the groups were compared. Feedback was obtained from the intervention group.

resultsMean score of the examination by the intervention group (29.85 ± 3.22) was significantly higher than and that of the control group (23.06 ± 4.09) (t = 7.14 and p < 0.05). The students shared that the assignment of drawing mind and concept maps for topics taught helped in attempting questions of the written examination by facilitating easy recall of the information learned. It aided to frame the answers to descriptive questions in a structured way with the use of keywords. However, identifying the concepts and establishing relationship between them was slightly challenging.

conclusion'Visual mapping' in the form of Mind and Concept mapping was found to be an effective learning tool for multifaceted CBME especially in promoting meaningful learning and facilitating rational thinking by the medical undergraduates.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalEducational MeasurementHumansLearningTeachingCommunity-based medical educationCommunity medicine, teaching-learningConcept mapMind mapRuralVisual mapping

Identifiers

PMID33849510
PMCPMC8045292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.