Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849501›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2021

Continuity in palliative care - analysis of intersectoral palliative care based on routine data of a statutory health insurance.

Laura Rehner, Kilson Moon, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Neeltje van den Berg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Rehner *Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany. laura.rehner@uni-greifswald.de.
Kilson Moon *Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Neeltje van den BergDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of palliative care is to prevent and alleviate a suffering of incurable ill patients. A continuous intersectoral palliative care is important. The aim of this study is to analyse the continuity of palliative care, particularly the time gaps between hospital discharge and subsequent palliative care as well as the timing of the last palliative care before the patient's death.

methodsThe analysis was based on claims data from a large statutory health insurance. Patients who received their first palliative care in 2015 were included. The course of palliative care was followed for 12 months. Time intervals between discharge from hospital and first subsequent palliative care as well as between last palliative care and death were analysed. The continuity in palliative care was defined as an interval of less than 14 days between palliative care. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Chi-Square.

resultsIn 2015, 4177 patients with first palliative care were identified in the catchment area of the statutory health insurance. After general inpatient palliative care, 415 patients were transferred to subsequent palliative care, of these 67.7% (n = 281) received subsequent care within 14 days. After a stay in a palliative care ward, 124 patients received subsequent palliative care, of these 75.0% (n = 93) within 14 days. Altogether, 147 discharges did not receive subsequent palliative care. During the 12-months follow-up period, 2866 (68.7%) patients died, of these 78.7% (n = 2256) received palliative care within the last 2 weeks of life. Of these, 1223 patients received general ambulatory palliative care, 631 patients received specialised ambulatory palliative care, 313 patients received their last palliative care at a hospital and 89 patients received it in a hospice.

conclusionsThe majority of the palliative care patients received continuous palliative care. However, there are some patients who did not receive continuous palliative care. After inpatient palliative care, each patient should receive a discharge management for a continuation of palliative care. Readmissions of patients after discharge from inpatients palliative care can be an indication for a lack of support in the ambulatory health care setting and for an insufficient discharge management. Palliative care training and possibilities for palliative care consultations by specialists should strengthen the GPs in palliative care.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesHumansInsurance, HealthPalliative CarePatient DischargeRetrospective StudiesClaims dataContinuity of patients careHospiceIntersectoral palliative carePalliative careRuralUrban

Identifiers

PMID33849501
PMCPMC8045326
OpenAlexW3153625846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.