Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849484›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Games of uncertainty: the participation of older patients with multimorbidity in care planning meetings - a qualitative study.

Jannike Dyb Oksavik, Marit Solbjør, Ralf Kirchhoff, Maren Kristine Raknes Sogstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jannike Dyb OksavikDepartment for Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Institutt for helsevitenskap, NTNU i Ålesund, Ålesund, Norway. jannike.d.oksavik@ntnu.no.
Marit SolbjørDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Trondheim, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Institutt for samfunnsmedisin og sykepleie, NTNU, Øya Helsehus, Mauritz Hansens gate 2, Trondheim, Norway.
Ralf KirchhoffDepartment for Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Institutt for helsevitenskap, NTNU i Ålesund, Ålesund, Norway.
Maren Kristine Raknes SogstadDepartment for Health Sciences, The Centre for Care Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU i Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActive patients lie at the heart of integrated care. Although interventions to increase the participation of older patients in care planning are being implemented in several countries, there is a lack of knowledge about the interactions involved and how they are experienced by older patients with multimorbidity. We explore this issue in the context of care-planning meetings within Norwegian municipal health services.

methodsThis qualitative study drew on direct observations of ten care-planning meetings and an interview with each patient right after the meeting. Following a stepwise-deductive induction approach, the analysis began inductively and then considered the interactions through the lens of game theory.

resultsThe care-planning interactions were influenced by uncertainty about the course of the disease and how to plan service delivery. In terms derived from game theory, the imaginary and unpredictable player 'Nature' generated uncertainty in the 'game' of care planning. The 'players' assessed this uncertainty differently, leading to three patterns of game. 1) In the 'game of chance', patients viewed future events as random and uncontrollable; they felt outmatched by the opponent Nature and became passive in their decision-making. 2) In the 'competitive game', participants positioned themselves on two opposing sides, one side perceiving Nature as a significant threat and the other assigning it little importance. The two sides negotiated about how to accommodate uncertainty, and the level of patient participation varied. 3) In the 'coordination game', all participants were aligned, either in viewing themselves as teammates against Nature or in ascribing little importance to it. The level of patient participation was high.

conclusionsIn care planning meetings, the level of patient participation may partly be associated with how the various actors appraise and respond to uncertainty. Dialogue on uncertainty in care-planning interventions could help to increase patient participation.

Indexed as

MultimorbidityPatient ParticipationHumansNorwayQualitative ResearchUncertaintyDelivery of health care, integratedGame theoryGoal-oriented careMultimorbidityPatient care planningPatient participationUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID33849484
PMCPMC8045290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.