Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849483›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2021

Automated detection and segmentation of thoracic lymph nodes from CT using 3D foveal fully convolutional neural networks.

Andra-Iza Iuga, Heike Carolus, Anna J Höink, Tom Brosch, Tobias Klinder, David Maintz, Thorsten Persigehl, Bettina Baeßler, Michael Püsken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Automated Segmentation of Lymph Nodes on Neck CT Scans Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Segmentation of mediastinal lymph nodes in CT with anatomical priors.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Cancer Prediction and Diagnosis.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andra-Iza IugaInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. andra.iuga@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3694-0235
Heike CarolusPhilips Research, Röntgenstraße 24, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna J HöinkInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Tom BroschPhilips Research, Röntgenstraße 24, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias KlinderPhilips Research, Röntgenstraße 24, 22335, Hamburg, Germany.
David MaintzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Thorsten PersigehlInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Bettina BaeßlerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Michael PüskenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn oncology, the correct determination of nodal metastatic disease is essential for patient management, as patient treatment and prognosis are closely linked to the stage of the disease. The aim of the study was to develop a tool for automatic 3D detection and segmentation of lymph nodes (LNs) in computed tomography (CT) scans of the thorax using a fully convolutional neural network based on 3D foveal patches.

methodsThe training dataset was collected from the Computed Tomography Lymph Nodes Collection of the Cancer Imaging Archive, containing 89 contrast-enhanced CT scans of the thorax. A total number of 4275 LNs was segmented semi-automatically by a radiologist, assessing the entire 3D volume of the LNs. Using this data, a fully convolutional neuronal network based on 3D foveal patches was trained with fourfold cross-validation. Testing was performed on an unseen dataset containing 15 contrast-enhanced CT scans of patients who were referred upon suspicion or for staging of bronchial carcinoma.

resultsThe algorithm achieved a good overall performance with a total detection rate of 76.9% for enlarged LNs during fourfold cross-validation in the training dataset with 10.3 false-positives per volume and of 69.9% in the unseen testing dataset. In the training dataset a better detection rate was observed for enlarged LNs compared to smaller LNs, the detection rate for LNs with a short-axis diameter (SAD) ≥ 20 mm and SAD 5-10 mm being 91.6% and 62.2% (p < 0.001), respectively. Best detection rates were obtained for LNs located in Level 4R (83.6%) and Level 7 (80.4%).

conclusionsThe proposed 3D deep learning approach achieves an overall good performance in the automatic detection and segmentation of thoracic LNs and shows reasonable generalizability, yielding the potential to facilitate detection during routine clinical work and to enable radiomics research without observer-bias.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAdultAgedAxillaCarcinoma, BronchogenicContrast MediaDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMediastinumMiddle AgedContrast MediaArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyDeep learningLymph nodesStaging

Identifiers

PMID33849483
PMCPMC8045346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.