Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849477›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2021

Assessment of feasibility and acceptability of family-centered care implemented at a neonatal intensive care unit in India.

Arti Maria, James A Litch, Maria Stepanchak, Enisha Sarin, Rashmi Wadhwa, Harish Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Multi-Professional Family Support Programme: A Collective Development at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arti MariaRam Manohar Lohia Hospital (RML) Hospital, New Delhi, India.
James A LitchGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), 19009 33rd Avenue W, Suite 200, Lynnwood, WA, 98036, USA. jim.litch@gapps.org.ORCID 0000-0003-0570-0308
Maria StepanchakGlobal Alliance to Prevent Prematurity and Stillbirth (GAPPS), 19009 33rd Avenue W, Suite 200, Lynnwood, WA, 98036, USA.
Enisha SarinVridhi Project, New Delhi, India.
Rashmi WadhwaRam Manohar Lohia Hospital (RML) Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Harish KumarVridhi Project, New Delhi, India.

Funding

U.S.A.I.D.(US) AID-OAA-A-14-00049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA family-centered care (FCC) parent participation program that ensures an infant is not separated from parents against their will was developed for the caring of their small or sick newborn at a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Delhi, India. Healthcare provider sensitization training directed at psychosocial and tangible support and an audio-visual training tool for parent-attendants were developed that included: 1) handwashing, infection prevention, protocol for entry; 2) developmentally supportive care, breastfeeding, expression of breastmilk and assisted feeding; 3) kangaroo mother care; and 4) preparation for discharge and care at home. The study aimed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the FCC model in a NICU in India.

methodsA prospective cohort design collected quantitative data on each parent-attendant/infant dyad at enrollment, during the NICU stay, and at discharge. Feasibility of the FCC program was measured by assessing the participation of parent-attendants and healthcare providers, and whether training components were implemented as intended. Acceptability was measured by the proportion of parent-attendants who participated in the trainings and their ability to accurately complete program activities.

resultsOf 395 NICU admissions during the study period, eligible participants included 333 parent-attendant/infant dyads, 24 doctors, and 21 nurses. Of the 1242 planned parent-attendant training sessions, 939 (75.6%) were held, indicating that program fidelity was high, and the majority of trainings were implemented as intended. While 50% of parent-attendants completed all 4 FCC training sessions, 95% completed sessions 1 and 2; 60% of the total participating parent-attendants completed session 3, and 75% completed session 4. Compliance rates were over 96% for 5 of 10 FCC parent-attendant activities, and 60 to 78% for the remaining 5 activities.

conclusionsFCC was feasible to implement in this setting and was acceptable to participating parent-attendants and healthcare providers. Parents participated in trainings conducted by NICU providers and engaged in essential care to their infants in the NICU. A standard care approach and behavior norms for healthcare providers directed psychosocial and tangible support to parent-attendants so that a child is not separated from his or her parents against their will while receiving advanced care in the NICU.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalKangaroo-Mother Care MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornParentsPatient-Centered CareProspective StudiesFamily participatory care, child rights, newborn-parent unityIndiaNeonatal healthNeonatal intensive care unitNewborn care, family-centered careSpecial newborn care unit

Identifiers

PMID33849477
PMCPMC8042842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.