Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849466›Full record

Trial reportBMC ophthalmology2021

Objective and subjective evaluation of trifocal diffractive intraocular Lens after cataract extraction with phacoemulsification: a prospective clinical study.

Ahmed A Zein El-Dein, Ahmed Elmassry, Hazem M El-Hennawi, Ehab F Mossallam

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04465279 (Evaluation of Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens After Cataract Extraction With Phacoemulsification), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04465279 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Evaluation of Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens After Cataract Extraction With Phacoemulsification

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled36ConditionsRefractive ErrorsArmsTrifocal diffractive intraocular lens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in cataract surgery: is a new era on the horizon?Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed A Zein El-DeinOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champollion Street, Al Attarin, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ahmed ElmassryOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champollion Street, Al Attarin, Alexandria, Egypt. ahmad.elmassry@gmail.com.
Hazem M El-HennawiOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champollion Street, Al Attarin, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ehab F MossallamOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champollion Street, Al Attarin, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to assess visual outcomes, quality of vision and patients' satisfaction of a trifocal diffractive intraocular lens after cataract surgery with phacoemulsification.

resultsThe study included 36 eyes that underwent implantation of trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL). The residual mean postoperative spherical equivalent was - 0.40 ± 0.29 diopters. Mean Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.80 ± 0.16 decimal (snellen equivalent 25 ft) while mean Uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was 0.82 ± 0.31 decimal (snellen equivalent 25 ft) and mean Uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) was 0.87 ± 0.20 decimal (snellen equivalent 23 ft). In defocus curve, there was infinitesimal gradual change between the three foci. Contrast sensitivity was just below the inferior limit of normal.

conclusionTrifocal diffractive IOL created a true intermediate focus proved by VA and defocus curve and better quality of vision assessed by contrast sensitivity and high order aberration. Moreover, it was safe and effective for correcting distance and near vision in these patients. Most of the patients were very satisfied and achieved spectacle independence.

trial registrationRegistration number and date: NCT04465279 on July 10, 2020.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionLenses, IntraocularPhacoemulsificationContrast SensitivityHumansLens Implantation, IntraocularPatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical studyIntraocular lensVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID33849466
PMCPMC8045310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.