Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849443›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of cultivars and wild species of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam).

Shizhuo Xiao, Pan Xu, Yitong Deng, Xibin Dai, Lukuan Zhao, Bettina Heider, An Zhang, Zhilin Zhou, Qinghe Cao

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive Chloroplast Genomic Insights intoPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic diversity of food-medicinalChinese herbal medicines · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Maternal Donor and Genetic Variation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Sweet Potato (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Phylogenomics and Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shizhuo Xiao *Jiangsu Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center/Sweetpotato Research Institute, China Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Xuzhou, 221131, China.
Pan Xu *College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730020, China.
Yitong Deng *Jiangsu Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center/Sweetpotato Research Institute, China Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Xuzhou, 221131, China.
Xibin DaiJiangsu Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center/Sweetpotato Research Institute, China Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Xuzhou, 221131, China.
Lukuan ZhaoJiangsu Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center/Sweetpotato Research Institute, China Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Xuzhou, 221131, China.
Bettina HeiderInternational Potato Center, Av.La Molina 1895, La Molina, Lima, Peru.
An ZhangJiangsu Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center/Sweetpotato Research Institute, China Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Xuzhou, 221131, China.
Zhilin ZhouJiangsu Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center/Sweetpotato Research Institute, China Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Xuzhou, 221131, China.
Qinghe CaoJiangsu Xuzhou Sweetpotato Research Center/Sweetpotato Research Institute, China Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Xuzhou, 221131, China. cqhe75@yahoo.com.
Sweet Potato Research Institute · CNInternational Potato Center · PELanzhou University · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System CARS-10-B1National Key Research & Development Program of China 2018YFD1000705/2018YFD1000700Research Foundation of Xuzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences XM2020002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam.) is an important food crop. However, the genetic information of the nuclear genome of this species is difficult to determine accurately because of its large genome and complex genetic background. This drawback has limited studies on the origin, evolution, genetic diversity and other relevant studies on sweetpotato.

resultsThe chloroplast genomes of 107 sweetpotato cultivars were sequenced, assembled and annotated. The resulting chloroplast genomes were comparatively analysed with the published chloroplast genomes of wild species of sweetpotato. High similarity and certain specificity were found among the chloroplast genomes of Ipomoea spp. Phylogenetic analysis could clearly distinguish wild species from cultivars. Ipomoea trifida and Ipomoea tabascana showed the closest relationship with the cultivars, and different haplotypes of ycf1 could be used to distinguish the cultivars from their wild relatives. The genetic structure was analyzed using variations in the chloroplast genome. Compared with traditional nuclear markers, the chloroplast markers designed based on the InDels on the chloroplast genome showed significant advantages.

conclusionsComparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of 107 cultivars and several wild species of sweetpotato was performed to help analyze the evolution, genetic structure and the development of chloroplast DNA markers of sweetpotato.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastIpomoeaIpomoea batatasGenome, PlantPhylogenyChloroplast genomeComparative analysisGenetic structureIpomoeaSweetpotato

Identifiers

PMID33849443
PMCPMC8042981
OpenAlexW3154096335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.