Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849440›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2021

Efficacy of 16S rRNA variable regions high-resolution melt analysis for bacterial pathogens identification in periprosthetic joint infections.

Samaneh Bourbour, Mohammad Emaneini, Mahmoud Jabalameli, Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi, Mohamad Naghi Tahmasebi, Amirheckmat Taghizadeh, Arash Sharafatvaziri, Reza Beigverdi, Fereshteh Jabalameli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Samaneh BourbourDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad EmaneiniDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahmoud JabalameliDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shafa Yahyaiyan Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad Javad MortazaviDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam Khomaini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, knee and hip surgeon, Tehran, Iran.
Mohamad Naghi TahmasebiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam Khomaini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, knee and hip surgeon, Tehran, Iran.
Amirheckmat TaghizadehSchool of Electrical and Computer engineering, college of engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Arash SharafatvaziriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam Khomaini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, knee and hip surgeon, Tehran, Iran.
Reza BeigverdiDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fereshteh JabalameliDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. jabalamf@tums.ac.ir.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRImam Khomeini Hospital · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate and rapid identification of microorganisms causing periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are necessary for choosing an appropriate antibiotic therapy. Therefore, molecular techniques are suggested for diagnosis in suspected PJIs. The Broad-range PCR and High-Resolution Melt Analysis (HRMA) were evaluated for the identification of causative organisms of PJIs in this study.

resultsFor 47 of 63 specimens, both the culture and broad-range PCR were positive. The culture was found to be able of organism's detection in 74.6% (47/63) of patients. Of 47 positive cultures, 11 (23.4%) were polymicrobial and 36 (76.59%) were monomicrobial cultures, in which 34 (91.89%) cases were detected by HRM assay. The sensitivity, specificity of HRMA vs monomicrobial culture were 91.89, 93.75%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity of total HRMA (mono + poly) vs culture were 82.92, 93.75%.

conclusionsHRM assay coupled with broad-range PCR are effective screening, rapid, and relatively cost-effective methods for discrimination of PJIs especially in aiding culture method. Using computer programs such as the Matlab-2018b program for HRM data analysis is also valuable and helpful in diagnosis.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesBacteriaBacterial InfectionsHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionProsthesis-Related InfectionsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBroad-range PCRHigh-resolution melt analysisPathogensPeriprosthetic joint infections

Identifiers

PMID33849440
PMCPMC8045251
OpenAlexW3156910427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.