Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849435›Full record

ReviewBMC gastroenterology2021

A case of intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in a branch duct: a rare case report and literature review.

Atsushi Yamaguchi, Takuro Hamada, Kaoru Wada, Riho Moriuchi, Kanae Tao, Hirona Konishi, Yuzuru Tamaru, Ryusaku Kusunoki, Toshio Kuwai, Hirotaka Kouno and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atsushi YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. yamaguchi.atsushi.uc@mail.hosp.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-4660
Takuro HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Kaoru WadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Riho MoriuchiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Kanae TaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Hirona KonishiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Yuzuru TamaruDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Ryusaku KusunokiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Toshio KuwaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Hirotaka KounoDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Kohei IshiyamaDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Naoto HadanoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Takeshi SudoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Naoyuki ToyotaDepartment of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Junichi ZaitsuDepartment of Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Kazuya KuraokaDepartment of Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
Hiroshi KohnoDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan.
National Hospital Organization · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas is a new disease concept defined by the World Health Organization in 2010. ITPN progresses with tubulopapillary growth in the pancreatic duct and is known to have a fair prognosis. Localization in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is one characteristic. There are few case reports of ITPN in a branch of the pancreatic duct (BD). CASE PRESENTATION: We encountered a case of ITPN localized in BD. An 85-year-old man was followed after colonic surgery for rectal carcinoma. An abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a cystic mass in the pancreatic head and further examination was done. A T2 weighted intension picture in magnetic resonance imaging showed a 20 mm cystic lesion with an internal mass of 15 mm. Duodenal papilla were slightly open and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography revealed mild and diffuse dilatation of the main pancreatic duct and mucin in the MPD. In consideration with the image examinations, we diagnosed the tumor as an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with carcinoma because of its large mural nodule (> 10 mm in size) in a cyst. Consequently, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Macroscopically, a white solid tumor sized 2.5 × 1.8 × 1.0 was identified in the head of the pancreas. The cut surface of the resected pancreas showed a side-branch type intraductal tumor with tubulopapillary architecture without mucin secretion. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for MUC1, and negative for MUC2 and MUC5AC. The final diagnosis was determined to be pancreatic ITPN from BD. At the time of this report (48 months post-surgery), the patient remains disease-free without evidence of recurrence.

conclusionITPNs localized in BD are rare and diagnosis prior to surgery is difficult. In our case, the shape was round, not papillary, and with little fluid. These characteristics are different from a branch duct type IPMN and can be a clue to suspect ITPN in BD.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCarcinoma, PapillaryPancreatic NeoplasmsAged, 80 and overHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreasBranch of pancreatic ductCase reportIntraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN)Main pancreatic ductPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID33849435
PMCPMC8045350
OpenAlexW3154246441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.