Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33849341›Full record

ArticleJournal of endourology2021

Focal Therapy Is a Viable Treatment for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Joel Berends, Ajith Dupati, John Dibianco, Arvin K George

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endourology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel BerendsDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9109-1256
Ajith DupatiDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
John DibiancoDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4031-873X
Arvin K GeorgeDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal therapy has been introduced as a novel treatment option for clinically localized prostate cancer. However, defining its role in the clinical space is still debated, especially with regards to identifying eligible candidates who will stand to benefit from treatment. Active surveillance (AS) is established as the preferred treatment for low-risk prostate cancer, with the goal of identifying those experiencing risk re-classification for curative intervention if it occurs. AS has been shown to be inferior to whole-gland treatments in to preventing progression or metastases. As a result, the field has sought solutions outside of the dichotomous options currently presented to men with low-risk cancer. Finally, the acceptance of preservation of sexual/urinary function and the avoidance of definitive therapy as valid endpoints has forced providers to think outside of survival alone as meaningful measures of success. It is here that focal therapy has emerged as a prospective replacement to AS or definitive treatment in carefully selected men. Combined with available risk stratification tools, focal ablation may afford patients durable oncological benefit while maintaining quality of life even in low-risk cancers.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeHumansMaleProspective StudiesProstatectomyactive surveillanceCryoablationFocal therapyHIFUProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33849341
OpenAlexW3155258284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.