Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33848677›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Cutaneous sensation of electrical stimulation waveforms.

Gavin Hsu, Forouzan Farahani, Lucas C Parra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gavin HsuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: ghsu@ccny.cuny.edu.
Forouzan FarahaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Lucas C ParraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, CUNY, 160 Convent Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
City College of New York · US

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Michael Peter Milham · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Defining Neuronal Circuits and Cellular Processes Underlying Resting fMRI SignalsR01MH111439 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER, SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2016 to 2020
$5.1M
A tool-box to control and enhance tDCS spatial precisionR01MH111896 · NIMH · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI BIKSON, MAROM · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
Effects of direct-current stimulation on synaptic plasticityR01NS095123 · NINDS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PARRA, LUCAS C · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Measurement of Electric Field and Hemodynamic Response During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using Magnetic Resonance ImagingR21NS115018 · NINDS · ADVANCED SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER · PI SHEREEN, AHMED · 2020 to 2020
$432k
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111439NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111896NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095123NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS115018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSkin sensation is the primary factor limiting the intensity of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). It is well established that different waveforms generate different sensations, yet transcranial stimulation has been limited to a relatively small number of prototypical waveforms.

objectiveWe explore whether alternative stimulation waveforms could substantially reduce skin sensation and thus allow for stronger intensities in tES.

methodsWe systematically tested a range of waveforms in a series of 6 exploratory experiments stimulating human adults on the forearm and in one instance on the head. Subjects were asked to rate skin sensation level on a numerical scale from "none" to "extreme".

resultsHigh frequency (>1 kHz) monophasic square wave stimulation was found to decrease in sensation with increasing duty cycle, baseline, and frequency, but the sensation was never lower than for constant current stimulation. For the purpose of injecting a net direct current (DC), a constant current is optimal. For stimulation with alternating current (AC), sensation decreased with increasing frequency, consistent with previous reports. Amplitude modulation did not reduce sensation below stimulation with constant AC amplitude, and biphasic square waveforms produced higher sensation levels than biphasic sinusoidal waveforms. Furthermore, for DC stimulation, sensation levels on the arm were similar to those reported on the head.

conclusionOur comparisons of various waveforms for monophasic and biphasic stimulation indicate that conventional DC and AC waveforms may provide the lowest skin sensations levels for transcutaneous electrical stimulation. These results are likely generalizable to tES applications.

Indexed as

SensationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultElectric StimulationHumansCutaneous discomfortSensationtACStDCSWaveform

Identifiers

PMID33848677
PMCPMC8919780
OpenAlexW3156139984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.