Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33848414›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2022

Validation of the Korean Version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 Profile V2.1 among Cancer Survivors.

Danbee Kang, Youngha Kim, Jihyun Lim, Junghee Yoon, Sooyeon Kim, Eunjee Kang, Heesu Nam, Sungkeun Shim, Mangyeong Lee, Haesook Bok and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of PROMIS-29 in patients receiving kidney replacement therapy.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hungarian PROMIS-29+2: psychometric properties and population reference values.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Danbee KangDepartment of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Youngha KimCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jihyun LimCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Junghee YoonDepartment of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Sooyeon KimDepartment of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Eunjee KangCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Heesu NamDepartment of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Sungkeun ShimCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Mangyeong LeeCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Haesook BokClinical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Won LeeSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.
Soo-Yong ShinDepartment of Digital Health, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
Jin Seok AhnDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dongryul OhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Juhee ChoDepartment of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of EducationMinistry of Food and Drug Safety 18182MFDS407National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1I1A2074210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to validate the Korean version of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 Profile v2.1 (K-PROMIS-29 V2.1) among cancer survivors. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants were recruited from outpatient clinics of the Comprehensive Cancer Center at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, from September to October 2018. Participants completed a survey questionnaire that included the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Pearson's correlations were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1.

resultsThe mean age of the study participants was 54.4 years, the mean time since diagnosis was 1.2 (±2.4) years, and 349 (87.3%) completed the entire questionnaire. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the seven domains in the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 ranged from 0.81 to 0.96, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. In the CFA, the goodness-of-fit indices for the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 were high (comparative fit index, 0.91 and standardized root-mean-squared residual, 0.06). High to moderate correlations were found between comparable subscales of the K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 and subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (r=0.52-0.73).

conclusionThe K-PROMIS-29 V2.1 is a reliable and valid measure for assessing the health-related quality of life domains in a cancer population, thus supporting their use in studies and oncology trials.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaCancerPROMIS-29Quality of lifeValidation

Identifiers

PMID33848414
PMCPMC8756127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.