ArticleAnesthesiology2021
Emergency Airway Management in Patients with COVID-19: A Prospective International Multicenter Cohort Study.
Article in Anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Difficult airway registry - An essential step towards safer anaesthesia practices.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Article
- Hospital cohort study on survival predictors for intubated coronavirus disease 2019 patients.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Article
- Approach to the Physiologically Challenging Endotracheal Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit.Respiratory care · 2023Review
- Airway Management: The Current Role of Videolaryngoscopy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- A Comparison of Intubation and Airway Complications Between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Critically Ill Subjects.Cureus · 2023Article
- Observational
- Aerosol precautions and airway complications: a national prospective multicentre cohort study.Anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Lessons from SARS‑CoV‑2 and its variants (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2022Review
- Airway recommendations for perioperative patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022Article
- Article
- Emergency Airway Management in COVID-19: Comment.Anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Emergency Airway Management in COVID-19: Reply.Anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Observational
- Thoracic Anesthesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic: 2021 Updated Recommendations by the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) Thoracic Subspecialty Committee.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2021Article
- Emergency Airway Management in the Time of COVID-19: Lessons for All?Anesthesiology · 2021Article
- Emergency Airway Management in Patients with COVID-19: A Prospective International Multicenter Cohort Study: Erratum.Anesthesiology · 2021Article
- High- versus low-fidelity simulation training for emergency front of neck access: A prospective observational study in a Swiss anesthesiology department.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
26 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTracheal intubation for patients with COVID-19 is required for invasive mechanical ventilation. The authors sought to describe practice for emergency intubation, estimate success rates and complications, and determine variation in practice and outcomes between high-income and low- and middle-income countries. The authors hypothesized that successful emergency airway management in patients with COVID-19 is associated with geographical and procedural factors.
methodsThe authors performed a prospective observational cohort study between March 23, 2020, and October 24, 2020, which included 4,476 episodes of emergency tracheal intubation performed by 1,722 clinicians from 607 institutions across 32 countries in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. The authors investigated associations between intubation and operator characteristics, and the primary outcome of first-attempt success.
resultsSuccessful first-attempt tracheal intubation was achieved in 4,017/4,476 (89.7%) episodes, while 23 of 4,476 (0.5%) episodes required four or more attempts. Ten emergency surgical airways were reported-an approximate incidence of 1 in 450 (10 of 4,476). Failed intubation (defined as emergency surgical airway, four or more attempts, or a supraglottic airway as the final device) occurred in approximately 1 of 120 episodes (36 of 4,476). Successful first attempt was more likely during rapid sequence induction versus non-rapid sequence induction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.49 to 2.39]; P < 0.001), when operators used powered air-purifying respirators versus nonpowered respirators (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.16 to 2.20]; P = 0.006), and when performed by operators with more COVID-19 intubations recorded (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03 for each additional previous intubation [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.06]; P = 0.015). Intubations performed in low- or middle-income countries were less likely to be successful at first attempt than in high-income countries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79]; P = 0.001).
conclusionsThe authors report rates of failed tracheal intubation and emergency surgical airway in patients with COVID-19 requiring emergency airway management, and identified factors associated with increased success. Risks of tracheal intubation failure and success should be considered when managing COVID-19. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.