Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33848324›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2021

Emergency Airway Management in Patients with COVID-19: A Prospective International Multicenter Cohort Study.

Danny J N Wong, Kariem El-Boghdadly, Ruth Owen, Craig Johnstone, Mark D Neuman, Paweł Andruszkiewicz, Paul A Baker, Bruce M Biccard, Gregory L Bryson, Matthew T V Chan and 16 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Airway Management: The Current Role of Videolaryngoscopy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Airway recommendations for perioperative patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Danny J N Wong
Kariem El-BoghdadlyORCID 0000-0002-9912-717X
Ruth Owen
Craig Johnstone
Mark D Neuman
Paweł Andruszkiewicz
Paul A Baker
Bruce M Biccard
Gregory L Bryson
Matthew T V Chan
Ming Hua Cheng
Ki Jinn Chin
Mark Coburn
Malin Jonsson Fagerlund
Clara A Lobo
Eugenio Martinez-Hurtado
Sheila N Myatra
Paul S Myles
Guillermo Navarro
Ellen O'Sullivan
Laura Pasin
Kathleen Quintero
Nabil Shallik
Faisal Shamim
Wilton A van Klei
Imran Ahmad
University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTracheal intubation for patients with COVID-19 is required for invasive mechanical ventilation. The authors sought to describe practice for emergency intubation, estimate success rates and complications, and determine variation in practice and outcomes between high-income and low- and middle-income countries. The authors hypothesized that successful emergency airway management in patients with COVID-19 is associated with geographical and procedural factors.

methodsThe authors performed a prospective observational cohort study between March 23, 2020, and October 24, 2020, which included 4,476 episodes of emergency tracheal intubation performed by 1,722 clinicians from 607 institutions across 32 countries in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. The authors investigated associations between intubation and operator characteristics, and the primary outcome of first-attempt success.

resultsSuccessful first-attempt tracheal intubation was achieved in 4,017/4,476 (89.7%) episodes, while 23 of 4,476 (0.5%) episodes required four or more attempts. Ten emergency surgical airways were reported-an approximate incidence of 1 in 450 (10 of 4,476). Failed intubation (defined as emergency surgical airway, four or more attempts, or a supraglottic airway as the final device) occurred in approximately 1 of 120 episodes (36 of 4,476). Successful first attempt was more likely during rapid sequence induction versus non-rapid sequence induction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.49 to 2.39]; P < 0.001), when operators used powered air-purifying respirators versus nonpowered respirators (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.16 to 2.20]; P = 0.006), and when performed by operators with more COVID-19 intubations recorded (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03 for each additional previous intubation [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.06]; P = 0.015). Intubations performed in low- or middle-income countries were less likely to be successful at first attempt than in high-income countries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79]; P = 0.001).

conclusionsThe authors report rates of failed tracheal intubation and emergency surgical airway in patients with COVID-19 requiring emergency airway management, and identified factors associated with increased success. Risks of tracheal intubation failure and success should be considered when managing COVID-19. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

COVID-19Airway ManagementCohort StudiesHumansIntubation, IntratrachealProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33848324
PMCPMC8274456
OpenAlexW3152715141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.