Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33848298›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Serological test performance for bovine tuberculosis in cattle from herds with evidence of on-going infection in Northern Ireland.

Lyanne McCallan, Cathy Brooks, Claire Barry, Catherine Couzens, Fiona J Young, Jim McNair, Andrew W Byrne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. B Cell and Antibody Responses in Bovine Tuberculosis.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lyanne McCallanVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6695-3689
Cathy BrooksVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Claire BarryVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Catherine CouzensVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Fiona J YoungVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Jim McNairVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Andrew W ByrneVeterinary Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to accurately identify infected hosts is the cornerstone of effective disease control and eradication programs. In the case of bovine tuberculosis, accurately identifying infected individual animals has been challenging as all available tests exhibit limited discriminatory ability. Here we assess the utility of two serological tests (IDEXX Mycobacterium bovis Ab test and Enfer multiplex antibody assay) and assess their performance relative to skin test (Single Intradermal Comparative Cervical Tuberculin; SICCT), gamma-interferon (IFNγ) and post-mortem results in a Northern Ireland setting. Furthermore, we describe a case-study where one test was used in conjunction with statutory testing. Serological tests using samples taken prior to SICCT disclosed low proportions of animals as test positive (mean 3% positive), despite the cohort having high proportions with positive SICCT test under standard interpretation (121/921; 13%) or IFNγ (365/922; 40%) results. Furthermore, for animals with a post-mortem record (n = 286), there was a high proportion with TB visible lesions (27%) or with laboratory confirmed infection (25%). As a result, apparent sensitivities within this cohort was very low (≤15%), however the tests succeeded in achieving very high specificities (96-100%). During the case-study, 7/670 (1.04%) samples from SICCT negative animals from a large chronically infected herd were serology positive, with a further 17 animals being borderline positive (17/670; 2.54%). Nine of the borderline animals were voluntarily removed, none of which were found to be infected post-mortem (no lesions/bacteriology negative). One serology test negative animal was subsequently found to have lesions at slaughter with M. bovis confirmed in the laboratory.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleFemaleMaleMycobacterium bovisNorthern IrelandSerologic TestsTuberculin TestTuberculosis, Bovine

Identifiers

PMID33848298
PMCPMC8043403
OpenAlexW3152553059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.