Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847977›Full record

Trial reportReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2021

Embryo Morphokinetics and Blastocyst Development After GnRH Agonist versus hCG Triggering in Normo-ovulatory Women: a Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Evaggelia Alexopoulou, Sacha Stormlund, Kristine Løssl, Lisbeth Prætorius, Negjyp Sopa, Jeanette Wulff Bogstad, Anne Lis Mikkelsen, Julie Forman, Nina la Cour Freiesleben, Janni Vikkelsø Jeppesen and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02746562 (A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of a "Freeze All and Transfer Later" Versus a Conventional "Fresh Embryo Transfer" Strategy for Assisted Reproductive Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02746562 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of a "Freeze All and Transfer Later" Versus a Conventional "Fresh Embryo Transfer" Strategy for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Women With a Regular Menstrual Cycle

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnja Bisgaard PinborgRan2016 to 2019Enrolled424ConditionsInfertilityArmsFreeze all
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Evaggelia AlexopoulouThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark. Evangelia.alexopoulou.02@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-8077-0560
Sacha StormlundThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Kristine LøsslThe Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Lisbeth PrætoriusThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Negjyp SopaThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jeanette Wulff BogstadThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anne Lis MikkelsenThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sealland University Hospital Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, DK-4600, Køge, Denmark.
Julie FormanSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5B, DK-1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nina la Cour FreieslebenThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Janni Vikkelsø JeppesenThe Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Christina BerghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Peter Samir Heskjær Al HumaidanThe Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Faculty of Health Aarhus University, Resenvej 25, Skive, 7800, Denmark.
Marie Louise GrøndahlThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 9, DK-2750, Herlev, Denmark.
Anne ZedelerThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Anja Bisgaard PinborgThe Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, DK-2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Hvidovre Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKAarhus University · DKHerlev Hospital · DKSahlgrenska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital Køge · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) for final oocyte maturation, along with vitrification of all usable embryos followed by transfer in a subsequent frozen-thawed cycle, is the most effective strategy to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). However, less is known about the ovulation induction triggers effect on early embryo development and blastocyst formation. This study is a secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, with the aim to compare embryo development in normo-ovulatory women, randomized to GnRHa or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger. In all, 4056 retrieved oocytes were observed, 1998 from the GnRHa group (216 women) and 2058 from the hCG group (218 women). A number of retrieved oocytes, mature and fertilized oocytes, and high-quality embryos and blastocysts were similar between the groups. A sub-analysis in 250 women enrolled at the main trial site including 2073 oocytes was conducted to compare embryo morphokinetics and cleavage patterns with EmbryoScope time-lapse system. In total, 1013 oocytes were retrieved from the GnRHa group (124 women) and 1060 oocytes were retrieved from the hCG group (126 women). Morphokinetic parameters and cleavage patterns were comparable between the groups. However, embryos derived from the GnRHa group were less likely to perform rolling during their development than the embryos from the hCG trigger group (OR = 0.41 (95%CI 0.25; 0.67), p-value 0.0003). The comparable results on embryo development and utilization rates between the GnRHa and hCG triggers is of clinical relevance to professionals and infertile patients, when GnRHa trigger and freeze-all is performed to avoid OHSS development. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02746562.

Indexed as

AdultBlastocystChorionic GonadotropinEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansOvulationOvulation InductionPregnancyChorionic GonadotropinGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneBlastocyst formationEmbryo developmentGnRHahCGMorphokinetiksOvulation trigger

Identifiers

PMID33847977
OpenAlexW3155972983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.