Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847880›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2021

Comparison of the Skin Cancer Quality of Life Impact Tool and the Skin Cancer Index Questionnaire in Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life and the Effect of Patient Education Brochures in Patients with Actinic Keratosis, Non-melanoma Skin Cancer, and Cutaneous Melanoma.

Sam El Abbadi, Laura Susok, Egger Stockfleth, Falk Georges Bechara, Thilo Gambichler, Swetlana Herbrandt, Lisa Goldschmidtböing, Michael Sand

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Skin Cancer Index into Brazilian Portuguese for patients with cervicofacial nonmelanoma skin cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sam El AbbadiDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital OWL, Campus Klinikum Bielefeld Center, Bielefeld, Germany.
Laura SusokDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Egger StockflethDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Falk Georges BecharaDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Thilo GambichlerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Swetlana HerbrandtDepartment for Statistical Consulting and Analysis, Center for Higher Education, Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Lisa GoldschmidtböingDepartment for Statistical Consulting and Analysis, Center for Higher Education, Technical University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Michael SandDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. michael.sand@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.
Ruhr University Bochum · DETU Dortmund University · DEKlinikum Bielefeld · DESt. Josef Krankenhaus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFew studies have evaluated patient-reported outcome measures and the effect of patient educational materials in German patients with skin cancer. We conducted a prospective study to measure the impact of treatment on health-related quality of life in German patients with skin cancer, identify variables that may contribute to changes in health-related quality of life, and evaluate the effect of providing additional information through a patient education brochure.

methodsA total of 461 patients diagnosed with actinic keratosis, nonmetastatic nonmelanoma skin cancer, melanoma in situ, or nonmetastatic cutaneous melanoma treated between August 2018 and July 2020 were included. Ninety-seven patients were randomly selected to receive an additional patient education brochure ("Hautkrebs"). The patients completed a Skin Cancer Quality of Life Index Tool (n = 324) or a Skin Cancer Index Questionnaire (n = 137) 1 week after surgical treatment.

resultsNinety-seven patients were provided an additional patient education brochure. We found statistical correlation between sociodemographic factors (young age and female gender) and the location of the skin cancer (head and face) and impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with skin cancer (p < 0.05). Moreover, we found that patients who were presented a brochure showed significantly higher awareness concerning direct sun exposure (p < 0.05).

conclusionImpaired health-related quality of life is correlated with a patient with skin cancer's age, gender, and the location of the lesion. Physicians should consider these factors in clinical practice and advocate the use of patient education brochures as effective assets in preventing the reoccurrence of skin cancer.

Indexed as

Patient education brochuresQuality of lifeSCIQSCQOLITSkin cancer

Identifiers

PMID33847880
PMCPMC8163937
OpenAlexW3153884890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.