Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847852›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2021

Assessing the reliability of an automated method for measuring dominance hierarchy in non-human primates.

Sébastien Ballesta, Baptiste Sadoughi, Fabia Miss, Jamie Whitehouse, Géraud Aguenounon, Hélène Meunier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sébastien BallestaLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives, UMR 7364, Strasbourg, France. ballesta@unistra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7854-5735
Baptiste SadoughiCentre de Primatologie, Université de Strasbourg, Niederhausbergen, France.
Fabia MissCentre de Primatologie, Université de Strasbourg, Niederhausbergen, France.
Jamie WhitehouseLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives, UMR 7364, Strasbourg, France.
Géraud AguenounonLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives, UMR 7364, Strasbourg, France.
Hélène MeunierLaboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives, UMR 7364, Strasbourg, France.
Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives · FROniris · FRUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Université de Strasbourg USIAS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among animal societies, dominance is an important social factor that influences inter-individual relationships. However, assessing dominance hierarchy can be a time-consuming activity which is potentially impeded by environmental factors, difficulties in the recognition of animals, or disturbance of animals during data collection. Here we took advantage of novel devices, machines for automated learning and testing (MALT), designed primarily to study non-human primate cognition, to additionally measure the dominance hierarchy of a semi-free-ranging primate group. When working on a MALT, an animal can be replaced by another, which could reflect an asymmetric dominance relationship. To assess the reliability of our method, we analysed a sample of the automated conflicts with video scoring and found that 74% of these replacements included genuine forms of social displacements. In 10% of the cases, we did not identify social interactions and in the remaining 16% we observed affiliative contacts between the monkeys. We analysed months of daily use of MALT by up to 26 semi-free-ranging Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana) and found that dominance relationships inferred from these interactions strongly correlated with the ones derived from observations of spontaneous agonistic interactions collected during the same time period. An optional filtering procedure designed to exclude chance-driven displacements or affiliative contacts suggests that the presence of 26% of these interactions in data sets did not impair the reliability of this new method. We demonstrate that this method can be used to assess the dynamics of both individual social status, and group-wide hierarchical stability longitudinally with minimal research labour. Further, it facilitates a continuous assessment of dominance hierarchies in captive groups, even during unpredictable environmental or challenging social events, which underlines the usefulness of this method for group management purposes. Altogether, this study supports the use of MALT as a reliable tool to automatically and dynamically assess dominance hierarchy within captive groups of non-human primates, including juveniles, under conditions in which such technology can be used.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorSocial DominanceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMalePrimatesReproducibility of ResultsAutomationDominance rankMacaquesMonkeysSocial conflictsSocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID33847852
OpenAlexW3155048540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.