Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847850›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2021

An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for the Deterioration Risk Prediction of Hepatitis Patients.

Junfeng Peng, Kaiqiang Zou, Mi Zhou, Yi Teng, Xiongyong Zhu, Feifei Zhang, Jun Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A systematic method for diagnosis of hepatitis disease using machine learning.Innovations in systems and software engineering · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junfeng PengDepartment of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Education, Guangzhou, 510303, China. pengjunf@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3039-0308
Kaiqiang ZouDepartment of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Education, Guangzhou, 510303, China.
Mi ZhouThe Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Yi TengDepartment of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Education, Guangzhou, 510303, China.
Xiongyong ZhuDepartment of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Education, Guangzhou, 510303, China.
Feifei ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Education, Guangzhou, 510303, China.
Jun XuDepartment of Computer Science, Guangdong University of Education, Guangzhou, 510303, China.

Funding

oundation for Young Innovative Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong ,China 201804010280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence-based computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system for the hepatitis has made great progress. Especially, the complex models such as deep learning achieve better performance than the simple ones due to the nonlinear hypotheses of the real world clinical data. However,complex model as a black box, which ignores why it make a certain decision, causes the model distrust from clinicians. To solve these issues, an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework is proposed in this paper to give the global and local interpretation of auxiliary diagnosis of hepatitis while retaining the good prediction performance. First, a public hepatitis classification benchmark from UCI is used to test the feasibility of the framework. Then, the transparent and black-box machine learning models are both employed to forecast the hepatitis deterioration. The transparent models such as logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT)and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) are picked. While the black-box model such as the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), random forests (RF) are selected. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) are utilized to improve the model interpretation of liver disease. The experimental results show that the complex models outperform the simple ones. The developed RF achieves the highest accuracy (91.9%) among all the models. The proposed framework combining the global and local interpretable methods improves the transparency of complex models, and gets insight into the judgments from the complex models, thereby guiding the treatment strategy and improving the prognosis of hepatitis patients. In addition, the proposed framework could also assist the clinical data scientists to design a more appropriate structure of CAD.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHepatitisDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineHepatitisLocal Interpretable Model-agnostic ExplanationsModel interpretationPartial Dependence PlotsSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.