Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847841›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021

Multidisciplinary telephone conferences about medication therapy after discharge of older inpatients: a feasibility study.

Lene Vestergaard Ravn-Nielsen, Alaa Burghle, Palle Mark Christensen, Faruk Coric, Trine Graabæk, Jolene Pilegaard Henriksen, Fjóla Karlsdóttir, Jens-Ulrik Rosholm, Anton Pottegård

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lene Vestergaard Ravn-NielsenHospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Solfaldsvej 38, 5000, Odense C, Denmark. lene.ravn-nielsen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9109-3270
Alaa BurghleHospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Solfaldsvej 38, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Palle Mark ChristensenGeneral Practice, Otterup, Denmark.
Faruk CoricHospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Solfaldsvej 38, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Trine GraabækHospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Solfaldsvej 38, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Jolene Pilegaard HenriksenHospital Pharmacy Funen, Svendborg Hospital, Svendborg, Denmark.
Fjóla KarlsdóttirHospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Solfaldsvej 38, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Jens-Ulrik RosholmGeriatric Department, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Anton PottegårdHospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Solfaldsvej 38, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.

Funding

The Ministry of Health in Denmark 1704197.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Studies have shown poor post-discharge implementation by the general practitioner of changes made to patients' medication during admission. Objective To assess the feasibility of conducting telephone conferences delivering information about changes in older patients' medications from hospital to general practitioners. Setting Two departments of geriatric medicine in a Danish routine healthcare setting. Method Older polypharmacy patients (≥ 65 years and ≥ 5 prescriptions) consecutively admitted were eligible for inclusion. Telephone conferences based on a review of these patient's medication therapy during hospital stay were arranged between a pharmacist and a geriatrician from the hospital, and a general practitioner. Interviews were conducted with pharmacists, geriatricians, and general practitioners about their perspectives on the feasibility of telephone conferences. Interviews were analyzed using systematic text condensation. Main outcome measure The proportion of telephone conferences conducted and perspectives on the feasibility of the study. Results A total of 113 patients were included and 82 patients (75%) were eligible for telephone conferences. A total of 40 (49%) telephone conferences were conducted. The main reasons for conferences not being conducted were general practitioners not wanting to participate or not returning the calls from the pharmacists. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: considerations on planning and running the project, Barriers, facilitators, and implications of the telephone conference, and Actual and desirable cross-sectorial communication. Conclusion Telephone conferences were only possible for half of the patients. The participating general practitioners, pharmacists and geriatricians expressed varied benefit and agreed that telephone conferences were mainly relevant for complex patients.

Indexed as

InpatientsPatient DischargeAftercareAgedFeasibility StudiesHumansPharmacistsTelephoneContinuity of careMedication reviewMultidisciplinary communicationMultimorbidityTelephone conferences

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.