Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847837›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Evaluating the impacts of on-site sanitation facilities and saltwater intrusion on shallow groundwater quality in peri-urban communities of Cape Coast, Ghana.

Joseph T Zume, Simon Mariwah, Ebenezer N K Boateng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph T ZumeDepartment of Geography and Earth Science, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania, 1871 Old Main Dr, Shippensburg, PA, 17257, USA. JTZume@ship.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0112-9079
Simon MariwahDepartment of Geography and Regional Planning, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Ebenezer N K BoatengDepartment of Geography and Regional Planning, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Populations in peri-urban communities of Sub-Saharan Africa frequently depend on shallow aquifers and on-site sanitation facilities concurrently. Routinely, domestic wells end up too close to toilet facilities, risking groundwater contamination. For coastal communities, saltwater intrusion adds to the risk of groundwater contamination. This study assessed both risks in five peri-urban communities of Cape Coast, Ghana. Groundwater samples collected from 40 domestic wells were analyzed for physicochemical and microbial constituents. Multivariate statistics including hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to classify and link contaminants to potential sources. Results indicate high enteric bacteria contamination in 98% of the samples, as well as high enrichment in physicochemical constituents, tied largely to impacts of on-site sanitation facilities. We found that wells located within 25 m of septic tanks/toilet facilities contained higher contaminant loads than those without such facilities within 25 m of their locations. Similarly, for wells located close to point sources, the closer the water table is below the land surface (within 2 m), the higher the contaminant loads. Lastly, using molar ratios of Cl

Indexed as

GroundwaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringGhanaSanitationWater SupplyWater Pollutants, ChemicalDomestic wellsGroundwater qualityOn-site sanitation facilitiesPeri-urbanPhysicochemical parametersSaltwater intrusion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.