Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847836›Full record

ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021

Modular megaprostheses in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur.

Sebastian R Apprich, Arastoo Nia, Markus M Schreiner, Maximilian Jesch, Christoph Böhler, Reinhard Windhager

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Total femur replacement in revision arthroplasty for non-oncologic patients: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Vancouver B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur: options for treatment.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Treatment Algorithm of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracturens.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian R ApprichDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. sebastian.apprich@meduniwien.ac.at.
Arastoo NiaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Markus M SchreinerDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Maximilian JeschDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph BöhlerDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Reinhard WindhagerDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic fractures (PPF) of the femur remain challenging, especially in patients with previous multiple revisions. Modular megaprostheses (mMPs) are rarely used in this indication; however, in some cases mMPs seem to be the last chance for limb salvage. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of PPFs of the femur treated by modular mMPs at our institution. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this study 33 patients (27 female; mean age 79 years) with a PPF after total hip or total knee arthroplasty (no tumor indications) were treated using modular proximal (mPFR; n = 12), distal (mDFR; n = 14) or total (mTFR; n = 7) femur replacement. A retrospective evaluation regarding mortality and revision rates was performed. Failures with need for revision were classified.

resultsAt a mean follow up of 60 months (range 0-178 months), the total mortality rate as well as total revision rate were both found to be 39%. At 1 year follow-up the mortality rate was highest within the mDFR group, and less revisions were necessary in the mPFR group, however both findings were not significantly. Those patients, who had revision surgery before PPF, were found to have higher revision rate after implantation of mMP. In the mPFR group, dislocation was the most frequent failure, within the mDFR and the mTFR group infection. In one case amputation of the lower limb was necessary.

conclusionmMPs represent a valuable option in PPFs of the femur. Infection and dislocation remain the most frequent complications. Prospective clinical studies are required to further define the outcome of mMPs in PPFs of the femur.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipHip ProsthesisPeriprosthetic FracturesAgedFemaleFemurHumansProspective StudiesReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFemurLimb salvageModular megaprosthesisTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33847836
PMCPMC8195977
OpenAlexW3156324181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.