ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Human-recognizable CT image features of subsolid lung nodules associated with diagnosis and classification by convolutional neural networks.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Chest Radiograph Captions Based on Natural Language Processing vs Completed by Radiologists.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Comparison of conventional 512-matrix CT images with Swin2SR-based 2048-matrix images in the visualization and diagnosis of lung nodules.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of skull-base invasion by nasopharyngeal tumors on CT with a deep-learning approach.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- The CNN model aided the study of the clinical value hidden in the implant images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Article
- A CT-based nomogram for predicting the risk of adenocarcinomas in patients with subsolid nodule according to the 2021 WHO classification.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022Article
- Development, Validation, and Comparison of Image-Based, Clinical Feature-Based and Fusion Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Models in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Classification of moving coronary calcified plaques based on motion artifacts using convolutional neural networks: a robotic simulating study on influential factors.BMC medical imaging · 2021Article
- Development and multicenter validation of chest X-ray radiography interpretations based on natural language processing.Communications medicine · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe interpretability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for classifying subsolid nodules (SSNs) is insufficient for clinicians. Our purpose was to develop CNN models to classify SSNs on CT images and to investigate image features associated with the CNN classification.
methodsCT images containing SSNs with a diameter of ≤ 3 cm were retrospectively collected. We trained and validated CNNs by a 5-fold cross-validation method for classifying SSNs into three categories (benign and preinvasive lesions [PL], minimally invasive adenocarcinoma [MIA], and invasive adenocarcinoma [IA]) that were histologically confirmed or followed up for 6.4 years. The mechanism of CNNs on human-recognizable CT image features was investigated and visualized by gradient-weighted class activation map (Grad-CAM), separated activation channels and areas, and DeepDream algorithm.
resultsThe accuracy was 93% for classifying 586 SSNs from 569 patients into three categories (346 benign and PL, 144 MIA, and 96 IA in 5-fold cross-validation). The Grad-CAM successfully located the entire region of image features that determined the final classification. Activated areas in the benign and PL group were primarily smooth margins (p < 0.001) and ground-glass components (p = 0.033), whereas in the IA group, the activated areas were mainly part-solid (p < 0.001) and solid components (p < 0.001), lobulated shapes (p < 0.001), and air bronchograms (p < 0.001). However, the activated areas for MIA were variable. The DeepDream algorithm showed the image features in a human-recognizable pattern that the CNN learned from a training dataset.
conclusionThis study provides medical evidence to interpret the mechanism of CNNs that helps support the clinical application of artificial intelligence. KEY POINTS: • CNN achieved high accuracy (93%) in classifying subsolid nodules on CT images into three categories: benign and preinvasive lesions, MIA, and IA. • The gradient-weighted class activation map (Grad-CAM) located the entire region of image features that determined the final classification, and the visualization of the separated activated areas was consistent with radiologists' expertise for diagnosing subsolid nodules. • DeepDream showed the image features that CNN learned from a training dataset in a human-recognizable pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.