Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847747›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Preconception Thyrotropin Levels and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Chinese Women Aged 20 to 49 Years.

Ying Yang, Tonglei Guo, Jinrong Fu, Jian Kuang, Yuanyuan Wang, Ya Zhang, Hongguang Zhang, Yuan He, Zuoqi Peng, Qiaomei Wang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Unveiling Hormonal Secrets]Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ying YangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Tonglei GuoNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Jinrong FuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jian KuangDepartment of Endocrinology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanyuan WangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Ya ZhangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Hongguang ZhangNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Yuan HeNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Zuoqi PengNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Qiaomei WangDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Haiping ShenDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Yiping ZhangDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Donghai YanDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Xu MaNational Research Institute for Family Planning, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Haixia GuanDepartment of Endocrinology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Tianjin Municipal Research Institute for Family Planning · CNNational Health and Family Planning Commission · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Maternal thyrotropin levels during gestation have a profound effect on pregnancy outcomes; however, few studies to date have evaluated the importance of preconception thyrotropin levels. Objective: To investigate the associations between preconception thyrotropin levels and pregnancy outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study enrolled Chinese women aged 20 to 49 years from the National Free Prepregnancy Checkups Project in China. Participants conceived within 6 months after the thyrotropin examination and completed follow-up for pregnancy outcomes between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed between May 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020. Exposures: Levels of thyrotropin within 6 months before pregnancy, measured as less than 0.10 mIU/L, 0.10 to 0.36 mIU/L, 0.37 to 2.49 mIU/L, 2.50 to 4.87 mIU/L, 4.88 to 9.99 mIU/L, and 10.00 mIU/L or greater. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association of maternal preconception thyrotropin levels with the 4 primary adverse pregnancy outcomes was assessed, including preterm birth (PTB), small for gestational age (SGA), birth defect, and perinatal infant death. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between preconception maternal thyrotropin levels and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The dose-response associations were assessed using restricted cubic spline regression. Results: This study enrolled 5 840 894 women (mean [SD] age, 26.30 [4.10] years) in the primary analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) thyrotropin level was 1.60 (1.06-2.37) mIU/L. The cumulative incidences for the adverse pregnancy outcomes were as follows: PTB, 6.56%; SGA, 7.21%; birth defect, 0.02%; and perinatal infant death, 0.33%. Compared with the reference group (thyrotropin range, 0.37-2.49 mIU/L), both low (<0.10 mIU/L and 0.10-0.36 mIU/L) and high (4.88-9.99 mIU/L and ≥10.00 mIU/L) maternal preconception thyrotropin levels were associated with higher risk of PTB (low: odds ratio [OR], 1.23 [95% CI, 1.19-1.27] and OR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.13-1.18] vs high: OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.10-1.15] and OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.08-1.20]), SGA (low: OR, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.33-1.40] and OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.12-1.17] vs high: OR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.08] and OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.11-1.23]), and perinatal infant death (low: OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10-1.43] and OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.24] vs high: OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.20-1.43] and OR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.21-1.80]). J-shaped associations between preconception thyrotropin levels and PTB (χ2 = 1033.45; nonlinear P < .001), SGA (χ2 = 568.90; nonlinear P < .001), and perinatal infant death (χ2 = 38.91; nonlinear P < .001) were identified. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, both low and high maternal thyrotropin levels were associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Results suggest that the optimal preconception thyrotropin levels may be between 0.37 mIU/L and 2.50 mIU/L to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultChinaFemaleHumansPreconception CarePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentThyrotropinYoung AdultThyrotropin

Identifiers

PMID33847747
PMCPMC8044736
OpenAlexW3155396251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.