ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021
Prediction of count phenotypes using high-resolution images and genomic data.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- FSF-GA: A Feature Selection Framework for Phenotype Prediction Using Genetic Algorithms.Genes · 2023Article
- Temporal phenomic predictions from unoccupied aerial systems can outperform genomic predictions.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- The Global Assessment of Oilseed Brassica Crop Species Yield, Yield Stability and the Underlying Genetics.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is revolutionizing plant breeding since the selection process is done with the help of statistical machine learning methods. A model is trained with a reference population and then it is used for predicting the candidate individuals available in the testing set. However, given that breeding phenotypic values are very noisy, new models must be able to integrate not only genotypic and environmental data but also high-resolution images that have been collected by breeders with advanced image technology. For this reason, this paper explores the use of generalized Poisson regression (GPR) for genome-enabled prediction of count phenotypes using genomic and hyperspectral images. The GPR model allows integrating input information of many sources like environments, genomic data, high resolution data, and interaction terms between these three sources. We found that the best prediction performance was obtained when the three sources of information were taken into account in the predictor, and those measures of high-resolution images close to the harvest day provided the best prediction performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.