ArticleMedicine2021
Performance evaluation of CA242 by flow fluorescence assay.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractCarbohydrate antigen 24-2 (CA24-2) is usually used as a biomarker for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer. Currentlly, a new quantitative assay kit for CA242 by flow fluorometry assay (FFA) was developed by Shanghai Tellgen Cooperation Co. Ltd. China. Therefore, we conducted the performance evaluation for it.According to the "Guiding principles on performance analysis of diagnostic reagents in vitro" and "American association of clinical laboratory standardization guidelines EP15-A2", the accuracy, precision, linear range, reportable range, biological reference interval verification, carry-over contamination rate, anti-interference capability and cross reaction of the assay kit used in TESMI F3999-Luminex200 automatic immunoassay system were evaluated. In addition, the assay kit was performed in parallel to CanAg kit (CanAg Diagnostics Products Beijing Co., Ltd.) to analyze the correlation between the 2 kits.The bias of accuracy of the new assay kit was less than 12.5% and the coefficient of variations (CVs) of precision were all less than 10.0%. The linear range of CA242 concentration of the testing kit was between 3.46 U/ml and 434.76 U/ml and the reportable range was 6.00 to 535.13 U/ml. The CA242 reference interval 0.00 to 20.00 U/ml was suitable for use in laboratory. The carry-over contamination rate was -0.14%. Correlation analysis showed a satisfactory relevance and consistency (r = 0.982, P < .001) between the new assay kit and CanAg kit, with a regression equation Y = 1.0012X to 0.878 (R2 = 0.9647, P < .001). No statistically significant difference between serum samples without interferences and samples containing lipemia, bilirubin and hemoglobin. And no cross reaction existed between the assay kit and the other tumor markers, such as carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and cytokeratin-19 soluble fragment (CYFRA21-1).The new CA242 quantitative assay kit possesses good detection performance when it is used in TESMI F3999-Luminex200 automatic immunoassay system, which can be used for the examination of CA242 in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.