Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847599›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

A Patient-Oriented App (ThessHF) to Improve Self-Care Quality in Heart Failure: From Evidence-Based Design to Pilot Study.

Constantinos Bakogiannis, Anastasios Tsarouchas, Dimitrios Mouselimis, Charalampos Lazaridis, Efstratios K Theofillogianakos, Antonios Billis, Stergios Tzikas, Nikolaos Fragakis, Panagiotis D Bamidis, Christodoulos E Papadopoulos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Constantinos Bakogiannis *Cardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1132-9835
Anastasios Tsarouchas *Cardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2883-2688
Dimitrios MouselimisCardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0266-302X
Charalampos LazaridisCardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7415-9570
Efstratios K TheofillogianakosThird Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8282-2136
Antonios BillisLab of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1854-7560
Stergios TzikasThird Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7811-5620
Nikolaos FragakisThird Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7158-4950
Panagiotis D BamidisLab of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-5805
Christodoulos E PapadopoulosCardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9643-9066
Vassilios P VassilikosCardiovascular Prevention and Digital Cardiology Lab, Third Cardiology Department, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0885-9170
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart failure (HF) remains a major public health challenge, while HF self-care is particularly challenging. Mobile health (mHealth)-based interventions taking advantage of smartphone technology have shown particular promise in increasing the quality of self-care among these patients, and in turn improving the outcomes of their disease.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to co-develop with physicians, patients with HF, and their caregivers a patient-oriented mHealth app, perform usability assessment, and investigate its effect on the quality of life of patients with HF and rate of hospitalizations in a pilot study.

methodsThe development of an mHealth app (The Hellenic Educational Self-care and Support Heart Failure app [ThessHF app]) was evidence based, including features based on previous clinically tested mHealth interventions and selected by a panel of HF expert physicians and discussed with patients with HF. At the end of alpha development, the app was rated by mHealth experts with the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). The beta version was tested by patients with HF, who rated its design and content by means of the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). Subsequently, a prospective pilot study (THESS-HF [THe Effect of a Specialized Smartphone app on Heart Failure patients' quality of self-care, quality of life and hospitalization rate]) was performed to investigate the effect of app use on patients with HF over a 3-month follow-up period. The primary endpoint was patients' quality of life, which was measured with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and the 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L). The secondary endpoints were the European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale (EHFScBS) score and the hospitalization rate.

resultsA systematic review of mHealth-based HF interventions and expert panel suggestions yielded 18 separate app features, most of which were incorporated into the ThessHF app. A total of 14 patients and 5 mHealth experts evaluated the app. The results demonstrated a very good user experience (overall PSSUQ score 2.37 [SD 0.63], where 1 is the best, and a median MARS score of 4.55/5). Finally, 30 patients (male: n=26, 87%) participated in the THESS-HF pilot study (mean age 68.7 [SD 12.4] years). A significant increase in the quality of self-care was noted according to the EHFScBS, which increased by 4.4% (SD 7.2%) (P=.002). The mean quality of life increased nonsignificantly after 3 months according to both KCCQ (mean increase 5.8 [SD 15] points, P=.054) and EQ-5D-5L (mean increase 5.6% [SD 15.6%], P=.06) scores. The hospitalization rate for the follow-up duration was 3%.

conclusionsThe need for telehealth services and remote self-care management in HF is of vital importance, especially in periods such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We developed a user-friendly mHealth app to promote remote self-care support in HF. In this pilot study, the use of the ThessHF app was associated with an increase in the quality of self-care. A future multicenter study will investigate the effect of the app use on long-term outcomes in patients with HF.

Indexed as

COVID-19Heart FailureMobile ApplicationsAgedHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPandemicsPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2User-Computer InterfacecaregiversCOVID-19heart failuremHealthpatientsself-caresmartphone app

Identifiers

PMID33847599
PMCPMC8080140
OpenAlexW3156057106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.