Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847587›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

Texas Public Agencies' Tweets and Public Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Natural Language Processing Approach.

Lu Tang, Wenlin Liu, Benjamin Thomas, Hong Thoai Nga Tran, Wenxue Zou, Xueying Zhang, Degui Zhi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lu TangDepartment of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1850-1511
Wenlin LiuJack J Valenti School of Communication, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3146-8645
Benjamin ThomasDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2545-6293
Hong Thoai Nga TranSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2312-1206
Wenxue ZouDepartment of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-4230
Xueying ZhangDepartment of Journalism and Mass Communication, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2731-829X
Degui ZhiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-1890
Texas A&M University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University · USRice University · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is characterized by different morbidity and mortality rates across different states, cities, rural areas, and diverse neighborhoods. The absence of a national strategy for battling the pandemic also leaves state and local governments responsible for creating their own response strategies and policies.

objectiveThis study examines the content of COVID-19-related tweets posted by public health agencies in Texas and how content characteristics can predict the level of public engagement.

methodsAll COVID-19-related tweets (N=7269) posted by Texas public agencies during the first 6 months of 2020 were classified in terms of each tweet's functions (whether the tweet provides information, promotes action, or builds community), the preventative measures mentioned, and the health beliefs discussed, by using natural language processing. Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to explore how tweet content predicted public engagement.

resultsThe information function was the most prominent function, followed by the action or community functions. Beliefs regarding susceptibility, severity, and benefits were the most frequently covered health beliefs. Tweets that served the information or action functions were more likely to be retweeted, while tweets that served the action and community functions were more likely to be liked. Tweets that provided susceptibility information resulted in the most public engagement in terms of the number of retweets and likes.

conclusionsPublic health agencies should continue to use Twitter to disseminate information, promote action, and build communities. They need to improve their strategies for designing social media messages about the benefits of disease prevention behaviors and audiences' self-efficacy.

Indexed as

PandemicsPublic HealthCOVID-19HumansNatural Language ProcessingSocial MediaTexasbeliefcommunicationcontent analysisCOVID-19disseminationengagementhealth belief modelnatural language processingpublic engagementpublic healthpublic health agenciessocial mediastrategyTwitter

Identifiers

PMID33847587
PMCPMC8078375
OpenAlexW3156658917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.