Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847586›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Impact of Big Data Analytics on People's Health: Overview of Systematic Reviews and Recommendations for Future Studies.

Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento, Milena Soriano Marcolino, Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem, Ishanka Weerasekara, Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat, Marcos André Gonçalves, David Novillo-Ortiz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Scenario for a Model of Excellence in Comprehensive Cancer Care.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

Israel Júnior Borges do NascimentoSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-0493
Milena Soriano MarcolinoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4278-3771
Hebatullah Mohamed AbdulazeemDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4529-7114
Ishanka WeerasekaraSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8195-5057
Natasha Azzopardi-MuscatDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9771-2770
Marcos André GonçalvesDepartment of Computer Science, Institute of Exact Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2075-3363
David Novillo-OrtizDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-0984
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DKTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Peradeniya · LK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the potential of big data analytics for health care is well recognized, evidence is lacking on its effects on public health.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of the use of big data analytics on people's health based on the health indicators and core priorities in the World Health Organization (WHO) General Programme of Work 2019/2023 and the European Programme of Work (EPW), approved and adopted by its Member States, in addition to SARS-CoV-2-related studies. Furthermore, we sought to identify the most relevant challenges and opportunities of these tools with respect to people's health.

methodsSix databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews via Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Epistemonikos) were searched from the inception date to September 21, 2020. Systematic reviews assessing the effects of big data analytics on health indicators were included. Two authors independently performed screening, selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the AMSTAR-2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2) checklist.

resultsThe literature search initially yielded 185 records, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria, involving more than 5,000,000 patients. Most of the included studies used patient data collected from electronic health records, hospital information systems, private patient databases, and imaging datasets, and involved the use of big data analytics for noncommunicable diseases. "Probability of dying from any of cardiovascular, cancer, diabetes or chronic renal disease" and "suicide mortality rate" were the most commonly assessed health indicators and core priorities within the WHO General Programme of Work 2019/2023 and the EPW 2020/2025. Big data analytics have shown moderate to high accuracy for the diagnosis and prediction of complications of diabetes mellitus as well as for the diagnosis and classification of mental disorders; prediction of suicide attempts and behaviors; and the diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of important clinical outcomes of several chronic diseases. Confidence in the results was rated as "critically low" for 25 reviews, as "low" for 7 reviews, and as "moderate" for 3 reviews. The most frequently identified challenges were establishment of a well-designed and structured data source, and a secure, transparent, and standardized database for patient data.

conclusionsAlthough the overall quality of included studies was limited, big data analytics has shown moderate to high accuracy for the diagnosis of certain diseases, improvement in managing chronic diseases, and support for prompt and real-time analyses of large sets of varied input data to diagnose and predict disease outcomes.

trial registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42020214048; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=214048.

Indexed as

Big DataCardiovascular DiseasesData ScienceDiabetes MellitusMental DisordersNeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSystematic Reviews as Topicbig databig data analyticsevidence-based medicinehealth statusmachine learningoverviewpublic healthsecondary data analysissystematic reviewWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID33847586
PMCPMC8080139
OpenAlexW3156811699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.