Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847561›Full record

Observational studyeLife2021

Quantifying noxious-evoked baseline sensitivity in neonates to optimise analgesic trials.

Maria M Cobo, Caroline Hartley, Deniz Gursul, Foteini Andritsou, Marianne van der Vaart, Gabriela Schmidt Mellado, Luke Baxter, Eugene P Duff, Miranda Buckle, Ria Evans Fry and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sensory event-related potential morphology predicts age in premature infants.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria M Cobo *Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3961-1568
Caroline Hartley *Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-0836
Deniz GursulDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Foteini AndritsouDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4408-167X
Marianne van der VaartDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8628-8719
Gabriela Schmidt MelladoDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-4357
Luke BaxterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9548-7162
Eugene P DuffDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8795-5472
Miranda BuckleDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ria Evans FryDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4062-6476
Gabrielle GreenDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amy HoskinDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard RogersDepartment of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Eleri AdamsNewborn Care Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Fiona Moultrie *Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1431-791X
Rebeccah Slater *Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1595-4846
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 207457/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 213486/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the high burden of pain experienced by hospitalised neonates, there are few analgesics with proven efficacy. Testing analgesics in neonates is experimentally and ethically challenging and minimising the number of neonates required to demonstrate efficacy is essential. EEG (electroencephalography)-derived measures of noxious-evoked brain activity can be used to assess analgesic efficacy; however, as variability exists in neonate's responses to painful procedures, large sample sizes are often required. Here, we present an experimental paradigm to account for individual differences in noxious-evoked baseline sensitivity which can be used to improve the design of analgesic trials in neonates. The paradigm is developed and tested across four observational studies using clinical, experimental, and simulated data (92 neonates). We provide evidence of the efficacy of gentle brushing and paracetamol, substantiating the need for randomised controlled trials of these interventions. This work provides an important step towards safe, cost-effective clinical trials of analgesics in neonates.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyPain ManagementPain MeasurementAcetaminophenAge FactorsAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticBlood Specimen CollectionBrainClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansInfant BehaviorInfant, NewbornMaleAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-Narcoticanalgesic clinical trialsbaseline sensitivityhumanmedicineneonatesneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33847561
PMCPMC8087440
OpenAlexW3154492132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.