Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847441›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology2021

Embracing nanomaterials' interactions with the innate immune system.

Abraham J P Teunissen, Marianne E Burnett, Geoffrey Prévot, Emma D Klein, Daniel Bivona, Willem J M Mulder

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Can Nuclear Imaging Detect Trained Immunity in Cardiovascular Disease?Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Nanotherapeutic Heterogeneity: Sources, Effects, and Solutions.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abraham J P TeunissenBiomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0401-8262
Marianne E BurnettBiomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Geoffrey PrévotBiomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Emma D KleinBiomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Daniel BivonaBiomedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Willem J M MulderDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS) and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Translational imaging and nanomedicine in inflammatory atherosclerosisP01HL131478 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Zahi A. Fayad · 2017 to 2026
$24.3M
Atherosclerosis in cocaine addiction: imaging risk with PET/MRR01DA049547 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Nelly Alia-Klein, Zahi A. Fayad · 2022 to 2026
$3.9M
PET nanoreporter image-guided breast cancer therapyR01CA220234 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FAYAD, ZAHI A., PÉREZ-MEDINA, CARLOS · 2018 to 2022
$3.6M
TRAF6 Nanoimmunotherapy to resolve plaque inflammationR01HL144072 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FAYAD, ZAHI A. · 2018 to 2021
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220234NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL131478NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144072NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA049547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has firmly established itself as a compelling avenue for treating disease. Although many clinically approved immunotherapeutics engage the adaptive immune system, therapeutically targeting the innate immune system remains much less explored. Nanomedicine offers a compelling opportunity for innate immune system engagement, as many nanomaterials inherently interact with myeloid cells (e.g., monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells) or can be functionalized to target their cell-surface receptors. Here, we provide a perspective on exploiting nanomaterials for innate immune system regulation. We focus on specific nanomaterial design parameters, including size, form, rigidity, charge, and surface decoration. Furthermore, we examine the potential of high-throughput screening and machine learning, while also providing recommendations for advancing the field. This article is categorized under: Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesNanostructuresImmune SystemNanomedicineNanotechnologyinnate immunotherapynanomaterialsnanomedicinenanotherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID33847441
PMCPMC8511354
OpenAlexW3155025036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.