Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847422›Full record

SynthesisUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2021

Fetal hydrops and the Incremental yield of Next-generation sequencing over standard prenatal Diagnostic testing (FIND) study: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

F Mone, R Y Eberhardt, M E Hurles, D J Mcmullan, E R Maher, J Lord, L S Chitty, E Dempsey, T Homfray, J L Giordano and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Performance of international phenotypic criteria for prenatal exome sequencing: systematic review and comparative diagnostic accuracy study using historical individual participant data.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic diseases underlying a spectrum of fetal effusions.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

F MoneInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-7547
R Y EberhardtWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
M E HurlesWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
D J McmullanWest Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
E R MaherDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
J LordWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
L S ChittyNorth Thames Genomic Laboratory Hub, Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
E DempseyMolecular and Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7653-4653
T HomfraySW Thames Regional Genetics Department, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J L GiordanoInstitute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
R J WapnerInstitute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
L SunFetal Medicine Unit and Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8467-0383
T N SparksCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-2186
M E NortonCenter for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
M D KilbyInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9987-4223
Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBShanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital · CNSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTERK12HD001262 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Andrea Vashti Jackson · 1998 to 2026
$9.3M
British Heart Foundation FS/18/79/33932Health Innovation Challenge from the UK Department of Health and Wellcome Trust HICF-R7-396NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001262Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the incremental yield of exome sequencing (ES) over chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in prenatally diagnosed non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF).

methodsA prospective cohort study (comprising an extended group of the Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes (PAGE) study) was performed which included 28 cases of prenatally diagnosed NIHF undergoing trio ES following negative CMA or karyotyping. These cases were combined with data from a systematic review of the literature. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched electronically (January 2000 to October 2020) for studies reporting on the incremental yield of ES over CMA or karyotyping in fetuses with prenatally detected NIHF. Inclusion criteria for the systematic review were: (i) at least two cases of NIHF undergoing sequencing; (ii) testing initiated based on prenatal ultrasound-based phenotype; and (iii) negative CMA or karyotyping result. The incremental diagnostic yield of ES was assessed in: (i) all cases of NIHF; (ii) isolated NIHF; (iii) NIHF associated with an additional fetal structural anomaly; and (iv) NIHF according to severity (i.e. two vs three or more cavities affected).

resultsIn the extended PAGE study cohort, the additional diagnostic yield of ES over CMA or karyotyping was 25.0% (7/28) in all NIHF cases, 21.4% (3/14) in those with isolated NIHF and 28.6% (4/14) in those with non-isolated NIHF. In the meta-analysis, the pooled incremental yield based on 21 studies (306 cases) was 29% (95% CI, 24-34%; P < 0.00001; I

conclusionsUse of prenatal next-generation sequencing in both isolated and non-isolated NIHF should be considered in the development of clinical pathways. Given the wide range of potential syndromic diagnoses and heterogeneity in the prenatal phenotype of NIHF, exome or whole-genome sequencing may prove to be a more appropriate testing approach than a targeted gene panel testing strategy. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Exome SequencingFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansHydrops FetalisKaryotypingMicroarray AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisProspective Studiesexome sequencingfetushydropsnext-generation sequencingnon-immune hydrops fetalisprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID33847422
PMCPMC8487902
OpenAlexW3153578041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.