Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847367›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2021

Global Epidemiology of Urticaria: Increasing Burden among Children, Females and Low-income Regions.

Gabrielle Peck, M Jawad Hashim, Cristin Shaughnessy, Suraj Muddasani, Nourhan Ali Elsayed, Alan B Fleischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Immunopathogenesis of urticaria: a clinical perspective on histamine and cytokine involvement.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Urticaria.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabrielle PeckCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 45242 Cincinnati, USA. E-mail: peckgl@mail.uc.edu.
M Jawad Hashim
Cristin Shaughnessy
Suraj Muddasani
Nourhan Ali Elsayed
Alan B Fleischer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urticaria has a high socioeconomic burden worldwide. However, the global epidemiology of urticaria and its geographical and temporal trends are not well studied. Using the Global Burden of Disease dataset, the aim of this study was to analyse the age-standardized prevalence, incidence, years lived with disability, and mean duration of urticaria in 195 countries from 1990 to 2017. In addition, the relationship between socioeconomic development and urticaria was evaluat-ed. The global prevalence of urticaria in 2017 was 86 million people. Females and children aged 1-4 years were more commonly affected than males and adults, respectively: these differences were outside the 95% uncertainty intervals. Regression analyses show-ed that a lower gross domestic product per capita was associated with a higher prevalence and incidence of urticaria (p < 0.001). The global prevalence of urticaria, incidence, and years lived with disability have remained stable from 1990 to 2017.

Indexed as

Global Burden of DiseaseUrticariaAdultChildFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceQuality-Adjusted Life Yearseconomicsepidemiologygross domestic producturticaria

Identifiers

PMID33847367
PMCPMC9364256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.