Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847352›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2021

Complementary Feeding Practices in 80 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Prevalence of and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Dietary Diversity, Meal Frequency, and Dietary Adequacy.

Giovanna Gatica-Domínguez, Paulo A R Neves, Aluísio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Inequities in Children's Food Environment: A Comparison between Slum and Non-slum Settings in Urban Bangladesh.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giovanna Gatica-DomínguezInternational Center for Equity in Health, Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5284-2654
Paulo A R NevesInternational Center for Equity in Health, Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1200-4725
Aluísio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2022-8729
Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Post-graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2465-2180

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 101815/Z/13/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdequate complementary feeding practices in early childhood contribute to better food preferences and health outcomes throughout the life course.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to describe patterns and socioeconomic inequalities in complementary feeding practices among children aged 6-23 mo in 80 low- and middle-income countries.

methodsWe analyzed national surveys carried out since 2010. Complementary feeding indicators for children aged 6-23 mo included minimum dietary diversity (MDD), minimum meal frequency (MMF), and minimum acceptable diet (MAD). Between- and within-country inequalities were documented using relative (wealth deciles), gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and absolute (estimated household income) socioeconomic indicators. Statistical analyses included calculation of the slope index of inequality, Pearson correlation and linear regression, and scatter diagrams.

resultsOnly 21.3%, 56.2%, and 10.1% of the 80 countries showed prevalence levels >50% for MDD, MMF, and MAD, respectively. Western & Central Africa showed the lowest prevalence for all indicators, whereas the highest for MDD and MAD was Latin America & Caribbean, and for MMF it was East Asia & the Pacific. Log GDP per capita was positively associated with MDD (R2 = 48.5%), MMF (28.2%), and MAD (41.4%). Pro-rich within-country inequalities were observed in most countries for the 3 indicators; pro-poor inequalities were observed in 2 countries for MMF, and in none for the other 2 indicators. Breast milk was the only type of food with a pro-poor distribution, whereas animal-source foods (dairy products, flesh foods, and eggs) showed the most pronounced pro-rich inequality. Dietary diversity improved sharply when absolute annual household incomes exceeded ∼US$20,000. All 3 dietary indicators improved by age and no consistent differences were observed between boys and girls.

conclusionsMonitoring complementary feeding indicators across the world and implementing policies and programs to reduce wealth-related inequalities are essential to achieve optimal child nutrition.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingDeveloping CountriesChild, PreschoolDietFemaleHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleMealsPrevalenceSocioeconomic Factorschild nutritioncomplementary feedinghealth equityinfant and young child feedingsocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID33847352
PMCPMC8245881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.