Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33847032›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2021

Social support networks of adults with sickle cell disease.

Stacy Desine, Lena Eskin, Vence L Bonham, Laura M Koehly

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Love vs. Risk: Women with Sickle Cell Disease Face Reproductive Decision-Making Dilemmas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stacy DesineHealth Disparities Unit, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lena EskinSocial Network Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vence L BonhamHealth Disparities Unit, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Laura M KoehlySocial Network Methods Section, Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4588-2898
National Human Genome Research Institute · US

Funding

The influence of familial social context on risk dissemination and copingZIAHG200335 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KOEHLY, LAURA M · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Insights into Sickle Cell Trait and Sickle Cell DiseaseZIAHG200394 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BONHAM, VENCE L · 2014 to 2025
$3.8M
Understanding the Relationships between Race, Ethnicity, Ancestry and GenomicsZIAHG200324 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BONHAM, VENCE L · 2009 to 2025
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200324Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200335Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200394NHGRI NIH HHS ZIAHG200394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) can cause both physical and psychological complications, such as severe pain and depression. These effects often necessitate social and caregiving support. Few studies have assessed support networks within the adult SCD population. Here, we describe the support networks of adults with SCD and identify who in these networks (1) provides emotional support, (2) is dependable during crisis situations, including social and financial adversities, and (3) provides assistance in health crises. Forty-nine adults with SCD completed surveys and social network assessments through interview. Generalized mixed-effects linear regression models were fitted to investigate the composition of support provision within these personal networks. Our findings indicate that parents and 'other important people' (e.g., friends, spouses) play key roles in the support provided to those with SCD. Siblings with SCD appeared to be more emotionally supportive than unaffected siblings. With much research centered around the pediatric and adolescent SCD populations, focus needs to extend to adults and the individuals involved in their care and disease management. Understanding the flow of support within these networks can help genetic counselors and healthcare providers to better identify both social ties that serve as support resources and less supportive relationships for individuals living with SCD and other chronic genetic conditions that might be targeted for intervention.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAdolescentChildHumansPainParentsSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnairesfamilypsychosocialsickle cell diseasesickle cell traitsocial support networkssupport

Identifiers

PMID33847032
PMCPMC12117497
OpenAlexW3153777036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.