Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846935›Full record

SynthesisPsychonomic bulletin & review2021

Emotional memories are (usually) harder to forget: A meta-analysis of the item-method directed forgetting literature.

Kelsi J Hall, Emily J Fawcett, Kathleen L Hourihan, Jonathan M Fawcett

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unexpected Events Resist Directed Forgetting.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Directed Forgetting and the Production Effect.Experimental psychology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The P300, the LPP, context updating, and memory: What is the functional significance of the emotion-related late positive potential?International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelsi J HallDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada. kjh402@mun.ca.
Emily J FawcettStudent Wellness and Counselling Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Kathleen L HourihanDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Jonathan M FawcettDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4248-5371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current meta-analysis explored whether emotional memories are less susceptible to item-method directed forgetting than neutral memories. Basic analyses revealed superior memory for remember (R) than forget (F) items in both the neutral, M = 19.6%, CI

Indexed as

CuesEmotionsHumansMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyResearch DesignEmotionIntentional forgettingMemoryMeta-analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.