Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33846841›Full record

Observational studyExperimental brain research2021

Suppression head impulse test paradigm (SHIMP) characteristics in people with Parkinson's disease compared to healthy controls.

Kim E Hawkins, Jorge Rey-Martinez, Elodie Chiarovano, Serene S Paul, Ariadna Valldeperes, Hamish G MacDougall, Ian S Curthoys

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kim E HawkinsVestibular Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. ktra3354@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6347-8779
Jorge Rey-MartinezNeurotology Unit, ENT department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Elodie ChiarovanoSydney Human Factors Research, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Serene S PaulDiscipline of Physiotherapy, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ariadna ValldeperesNeurotology Unit, ENT department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Hamish G MacDougallSydney Human Factors Research, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Ian S CurthoysVestibular Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The suppression head impulse test paradigm (SHIMP) is a newly described indicator of vestibular function which yields two measures: vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain and a saccadic response. It is an alternative and complementary test to the head impulse test paradigm (HIMP). Parkinson's disease (PD) has known saccadic and central vestibular pathway dysfunction. This paper is the first description of SHIMP VOR gain and saccade characteristic in this population. This prospective observational study measured the SHIMP VOR gain and saccade characteristics in 39 participants with idiopathic PD and compared this to 40 healthy controls (HC). The effect of group, demographic variables and SHIMP characteristics were evaluated. SHIMP VOR gains were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.10). Compared to HC, the PD group mean SHIMP peak saccade velocity was significantly reduced by an average of 77.07°/sec (p < 0.001), and SHIMP saccade response latency was longer, with an average delay of 23.5 ms (p = 0.003). SHIMP saccade peak velocity was also associated with both head impulse velocity (p = 0.002) and SHIMP VOR gain (p = 0.004) variables, but there was no significant influence of these variables when SHIMP saccade peak velocity was considered as a predictor of PD (p = 0.52-0.91). VOR gains were unaffected by PD. PD-specific saccadic dysfunction, namely reduced peak saccade velocities and prolonged response latencies, were observed in the SHIMP-induced saccade responses. VOR gain using slow phase eye velocity is preferred as the indicator of vestibular function in the SHIMPs paradigm as non-vestibular factors affected saccade peak velocity.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseVestibule, LabyrinthHead Impulse TestHumansReflex, Vestibulo-OcularSaccadesHIMPParkinson’s diseaseSHIMPVestibularVHITVOR

Identifiers

PMID33846841
OpenAlexW3154052413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.